Using remote sensing to detect weed infestations in Glycine max

被引:0
|
作者
Medlin, CR [1 ]
Shaw, DR [1 ]
Gerard, PD [1 ]
LaMastus, FE [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; pitted morningglory; Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin et Barnaby CASOB; sicklepod; Solanum carolinense L. SOLCA; horsenettle; Glycine max (L.) Merr; soybean; precision farming; site-specific agriculture; variable-rate application;
D O I
10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0393:URSTDW]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The objective of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of remote sensing for detecting weed infestation levels during early-season Glycine max production. Weed population estimates were collected from two G. max fields approximately 8 wk after planting during summer 1998. Seedling weed populations were sampled using a regular grid coordinate system on a 10- by 10-m grid. Two days later, multispectral digital images of the fields were recorded. Generally, infestations of Senna obtusifolia, Ipomoea lacunosa, and Solanum carolinense could be detected with remote sensing with at least 75% accuracy. Threshold populations of 10 or more S. obtusifolia or I. lacunosa plants m(-2) were generally classified with at least 85% accuracy. Discriminant analysis functions formed for detecting weed populations in one field were at least 73% accurate in identifying S. obtusifolia and I. lacunosa infestations in independently collected data from another field. Due to highly variable soil conditions and their effects on the reflectance properties of the surrounding soil and vegetation, accurate classification of weed-free areas was generally much lower. Current remote sensing technology has potential for in-season weed detection; however, further advancements of the technology are needed to insure its use in future prescription weed management systems.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 398
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using electrolyte leakage to detect soybean (Glycine max) cultivars sensitive to sulfentrazone
    Li, ZH
    Walker, RH
    Wehtje, G
    Hancock, HG
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 14 (04) : 699 - 704
  • [22] Bioefficacy of chlorimuron ethyl for weed control in soybean (Glycine max)
    Tiwari, JP
    Kurchania, SP
    Paradkar, NR
    Bhalla, CS
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1996, 66 (10): : 583 - 588
  • [23] Weed management in soybean (Glycine max) ecosystem in Madhya Pradesh
    Billore, SD
    Joshi, OP
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1998, 68 (10): : 699 - 700
  • [24] CINMETHYLIN FOR WEED-CONTROL IN SOYBEANS, GLYCINE-MAX
    BHOWMIK, PC
    WEED SCIENCE, 1988, 36 (05) : 678 - 682
  • [25] IMAZETHAPYR FOR WEED-CONTROL IN SOYBEAN (GLYCINE-MAX)
    CANTWELL, JR
    LIEBL, RA
    SLIFE, FW
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 3 (04) : 596 - 601
  • [26] Efficacy of metribuzin and trifluralin on weed management in soybean (Glycine max)
    Jeyabal, A
    Palaniappan, S
    Chelliah, S
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2001, 46 (02) : 339 - 342
  • [27] Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with flumetsulam, cloransulam, and diclosulam
    Shaw, DR
    Bennett, AC
    Grant, DL
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) : 791 - 798
  • [28] Field evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) genotypes for weed competitiveness
    Bussan, AJ
    Burnside, OC
    Orf, JH
    Ristau, EA
    Puettmann, KJ
    WEED SCIENCE, 1997, 45 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [29] Weed management in soybean (Glycine max)-based intercropping system
    Dubey, MP
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1998, 43 (04) : 606 - 611
  • [30] INFLUENCE OF SHADING BY SOYBEANS (GLYCINE-MAX) ON WEED SUPPRESSION
    MURPHY, TR
    GOSSETT, BJ
    WEED SCIENCE, 1981, 29 (05) : 610 - 615