Prediction of Conversion to Alzheimer's Disease with Longitudinal Measures and Time-To-Event Data

被引:82
|
作者
Li, Kan [1 ]
Chan, Wenyaw [1 ]
Doody, Rachelle S. [2 ]
Quinn, Joseph [3 ,4 ]
Luo, Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] E Hoffman La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Neurol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Portland VA Med Ctr, Portland, OR USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ADNI; joint modeling; longitudinal and survival data; mild cognitive impairment; prediction; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; CLINICAL PREDICTORS; MRI BIOMARKERS; PROGRESSION; MODEL; AD; SURVIVAL; DECLINE; CSF;
D O I
10.3233/JAD-161201
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Identifying predictors of conversion to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critically important for AD prevention and targeted treatment. Objective: To compare various clinical and biomarker trajectories for tracking progression and predicting conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to probable AD. Methods: Participants were from the ADNI-1 study. We assessed the ability of 33 longitudinal biomarkers to predict time to AD conversion, accounting for demographic and genetic factors. We used joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data to examine the association between changes of measures and disease progression. We also employed time-dependent receiver operating characteristic method to assess the discriminating capability of the measures. Results: 23 of 33 longitudinal clinical and imaging measures are significant predictors of AD conversion beyond demographic and genetic factors. The strong phenotypic and biological predictors are in the cognitive domain (ADAS-Cog; RAVLT), functional domain (FAQ), and neuroimaging domain (middle temporal gyrus and hippocampal volume). The strongest predictor is ADAS-Cog 13 with an increase of one SD in ADAS-Cog 13 increased the risk of AD conversion by 2.92 times. Conclusion: Prediction of AD conversion can be improved by incorporating longitudinal change information, in addition to baseline characteristics. Cognitive measures are consistently significant and generally stronger predictors than imaging measures.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 370
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease: Time-to-Event Analysis in a Pooled Population
    Tocco, Michael
    Hendrix, Suzanne
    Miller, Michael L.
    Pejovic, Vojislav
    Graham, Stephen M.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (09) : A621 - A621
  • [42] A Bayesian quantile joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Kundu, Damitri
    Krishnan, Shekhar
    Gogoi, Manash Pratim
    Das, Kiranmoy
    [J]. LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2024, 30 (03) : 680 - 699
  • [43] A TIME-TO-EVENT FRAMEWORK FOR QUANTIFYING CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF EFFECT IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE CLINICAL TRIALS
    McManus, S.
    Barnes, F. B.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S217 - S217
  • [44] Modeling biomarker variability in joint analysis of longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Wang, Chunyu
    Shen, Jiaming
    Charalambous, Christiana
    Pan, Jianxin
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2023, 25 (02) : 577 - 596
  • [45] Bayesian functional joint models for multivariate longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Li, Kan
    Luo, Sheng
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2019, 129 : 14 - 29
  • [46] Joint latent class models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: A review
    Proust-Lima, Cecile
    Sene, Mbery
    Taylor, Jeremy M. G.
    Jacqmin-Gadda, Helene
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (01) : 74 - 90
  • [47] Joint Models of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data with More Than One Event Time Outcome: A Review
    Hickey, Graeme L.
    Philipson, Pete
    Jorgensen, Andrea
    Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2018, 14 (01):
  • [48] Deep and joint learning of longitudinal data for Alzheimer's disease prediction
    Lei, Baiying
    Yang, Mengya
    Yang, Peng
    Zhou, Feng
    Hou, Wen
    Zou, Wenbin
    Li, Xia
    Wang, Tianfu
    Xiao, Xiaohua
    Wang, Shuqiang
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2020, 102 (102)
  • [49] Dynamic prediction of outcome for patients with severe aortic stenosis: application of joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou
    Dimitris Rizopoulos
    Marcel L. Geleijnse
    Emmanuel Lesaffre
    Ad J. J. C. Bogers
    Johanna J. M. Takkenberg
    [J]. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 15
  • [50] Dynamic prediction of outcome for patients with severe aortic stenosis: application of joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data
    Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    Geleijnse, Marcel L.
    Lesaffre, Emmanuel
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    Takkenberg, Johanna J. M.
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2015, 15