Power-exponent function model for low-cycle fatigue life prediction and its applications - Part II: Life prediction of turbine blades under creep-fatigue interaction

被引:35
|
作者
Chen, Lijie
Liu, Yinghua [1 ]
Xie, Liyang
机构
[1] Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Sch Aerosp, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] NE Univ, Sch Mech Engn & Automat, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
关键词
life prediction; turbine blades; creep-fatigue interaction; modified linear damage summation method; modified strain range partitioning method;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.03.005
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper is concerned with the applications of the proposed models, namely the modified linear damage summation (MLDS) method and the modified strain range partitioning (MSRP) method described in Part I of the series papers, to life prediction of turbine blades under creep-fatigue interaction. To begin with, a detailed FEM analysis is conducted considering peak loading of thermal load, centrifugal force and airflow force to determine life assessment positions. Secondly, according to the blades rig testing load, a stress-strain response analysis is performed for pure low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and creep fatigue interaction, in which steady-state temperature field, plastic kinematic hardening and contact between the blade body and hoop segment are taken into consideration to achieve accordance with practical conditions. Finally, based on FEM simulation results, the life of turbine blades is predicted using the five different models for creep-fatigue loading. A minimum safe and conservative life of 1293 h is given by the MLDS method based on power-exponent function model. The predicted lives by the MLDS and MSRP methods show reasonable agreement with the rig testing life, which further illustrates the validity of power-exponent function model and its applications. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model for life prediction of fatigue-creep interaction
    Valentin, R.
    Barker, Donald
    Osterman, Michael
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2008, 48 (11-12) : 1831 - 1836
  • [32] Creep-fatigue interaction of soft adhesive under shear loading: Damage diagram and life prediction model
    Xia, Yan
    Yao, Chengbin
    Li, Zheyu
    Yang, Zhuoran
    Jiang, Han
    Zhu, Zhongmeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2024, 188
  • [33] A deep learning based life prediction method for components under creep, fatigue and creep-fatigue conditions
    Zhang, Xiao-Cheng
    Gong, Jian-Guo
    Xuan, Fu-Zhen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2021, 148
  • [34] PREDICTION OF LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE LIFE OF SPECIMENS WITH FABRICATION FLAWS
    PICKETT, AG
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1968, 90 (04): : 620 - &
  • [35] PREDICTION OF LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE LIFE OF SPECIMENS WITH FABRICATION FLAWS
    PICKETT, AG
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1968, 90 (12) : 74 - &
  • [36] Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior and Life Prediction of Copper Busbar
    Pang, Jian Chao
    Nie, Liang Liang
    Zhu, Li Bei
    Zhang, Zhen Jun
    Yao, Ge
    Mao, Yun Xian
    Chen, Man
    Zhang, Zhe Feng
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2016, 18 (12) : 2018 - 2027
  • [37] CREEP FATIGUE LIFE PREDICTION USING SIMPLE HIGH-TEMPERATURE LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE TESTING MACHINES
    ENDO, T
    SAKON, T
    METALS TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 11 (NOV): : 489 - 496
  • [38] Experimental and Numerical Investigation of High-Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Life of Bellows
    Krovvidi, S. C. S. P. Kumar
    Goyal, Sunil
    Bhaduri, A. K.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2021, 30 (04) : 2742 - 2750
  • [39] Experimental and Numerical Investigation of High-Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Life of Bellows
    S. C. S. P. Kumar Krovvidi
    Sunil Goyal
    A. K. Bhaduri
    Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2021, 30 : 2742 - 2750
  • [40] A low-cycle fatigue life prediction model of ultrafine-grained metals
    Ding, HZ
    Mughrabi, H
    Höppel, HW
    FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2002, 25 (10) : 975 - 984