A multifaceted intervention for evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention: a 3 year follow-up

被引:12
|
作者
Sving, Eva [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fredriksson, Lennart [3 ]
Mamhidir, Anna-Greta [2 ,4 ]
Hogman, Marieann [5 ]
Gunningberg, Lena [2 ]
机构
[1] Reg Gavleborg, Dept Patient Safety, Gavle, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Care & Caring Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Reg Gavleborg, Ctr Res & Dev, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Gavle, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, Gavle, Sweden
[5] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci Resp Allergy & Sleep Res, Uppsala, Sweden
来源
JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION | 2020年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
implementation; nursing; pressure ulcer; prevention; sustainability;
D O I
10.1097/XEB.0000000000000239
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To assess sustainability of an intervention used to implement pressure ulcer prevention. Background: The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Service framework was used to develop an intervention aimed to implement evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention in a hospital setting. A short-term follow-up showed that significantly more patients received pressure ulcer prevention. A qualitative process evaluation gave support that the intervention and the implementation process changed the understanding and approach to working with pressure ulcer prevention from treating to preventing. Method: The study had a sequential mixed method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data. For the quantitative data, baseline and short-term follow-up (6-8 months) data reported in an initial study were compared with long-term follow-up (36-42 months) data (n = 259 patients). For the qualitative data, interviews with registered nurses (n = 20), assistant nurses (n = 7) and first-line managers (n = 5) were performed. Results: The performance of pressure ulcer prevention was sustained 3 years from its conception. The number of patients with pressure ulcers was reduced (P = 0.021). Systematic work with quality measurements, support from first-line managers, internal facilitation, collaboration and pressure ulcer prevention skills could explained the sustainability. Obstacles to achieve high-quality pressure ulcer prevention were inadequate communication, high workloads and high rates of new and substitute nurses. Conclusion: Three different components for sustainability on the micro-level are described; benefits for the patients, the need for routinization and development over time. Threats to sustainability are described as factors on the macro-level. There needs to be collaboration in the healthcare organization from the micro-to-macro levels, and committed experienced nurses are needed to obtain high-quality sustainable pressure ulcer prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evidence-based urology in practice: loss to follow-up
    Karl, Alexander
    Akl, Elie A.
    Moy, M. Louis
    Dahm, Philipp
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (01) : 24 - 26
  • [12] Evidence-based follow-up in renal cell carcinoma
    Karl Mayrhofer
    Dora Niedersüß-Beke
    memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology, 2020, 13 : 78 - 83
  • [13] Evidence-based follow-up of lung cancer patients
    Smith, TJ
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (03) : 361 - 368
  • [14] Evidence-based follow-up in renal cell carcinoma
    Mayrhofer, Karl
    Niedersuss-Beke, Dora
    MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [15] Under pressure: extended implementation of evidence-based practices for pressure ulcer prevention
    Vetter, C.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 : 21 - 21
  • [16] Evidence-based review of the effects of nutritional supplementation for pressure ulcer prevention
    Yap, JiannWen
    Holloway, Samantha
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (06) : 805 - 821
  • [17] Three-year follow-up of implementation of evidence-based transfusion practice in a tertiary hospital
    Norgaard, A.
    Stensballe, J.
    de Lichtenberg, T. H.
    White, J. O.
    Perner, A.
    Wanscher, M.
    Hillingso, J.
    Holm, M. L.
    Mau-Sorensen, M.
    Sillesen, H.
    Kjeldsen, L.
    Back, C.
    Nielsen, J.
    Seeberg, J.
    Hansen, M. B.
    Johansson, P. I.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2017, 112 (03) : 229 - 239
  • [18] Follow-Up of Melanoma Patients: The Need for Evidence-Based Protocols
    Francken, Anne Brecht
    Hoekstra, Harald J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (04) : 804 - 805
  • [20] The Value of Gynecologic Cancer Follow-Up Evidence-Based Ignorance?
    Lajer, Henrik
    Jensen, Mette B.
    Kilsmark, Jannie
    Albaek, Jens
    Svane, Danny
    Mirza, Mansoor R.
    Geertsen, Poul F.
    Reerman, Diana
    Hansen, Kare
    Milter, Maya C.
    Mogensen, Ole
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (08) : 1307 - 1320