Sirolimus in association with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients

被引:452
|
作者
Kreis, H
Cisterne, JM
Land, W
Wramner, L
Squifflet, JP
Abramowicz, D
Campistol, JM
Morales, JM
Grinyo, JM
Mourad, G
Berthoux, FC
Brattström, C
Lebranchu, Y
Vialtel, P
机构
[1] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Serv Reanimat & Transplantat, F-75747 Paris, France
[2] CHU Rangueil, F-31054 Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Munich, Grossenharden Clin, Munich, Germany
[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Clin Univ St Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[6] Hop Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Hosp 12 Octubre, E-28041 Madrid, Spain
[9] CHU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
[10] Hop Nord St Etienne, St Etienne, France
[11] Bellvitge Hosp, Barcelona, Spain
[12] Karolinska Inst, Huddinge Hosp, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[13] CHU Bretonneau, F-37044 Tours, France
[14] Hop Albert Michallon, Grenoble, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-200004150-00009
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. A previous trial in renal transplantation comparing sirolimus (rapamycin) to cyclosporine (CsA) ina triple-drug therapy regimen with azathioprine and corticosteroids found that the incidence of acute rejection was similar (approximately 40%) with a trend for better renal function with sirolimus. Methods. In 14 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus (n=40) or CsA (n=38) in an open-label design. All patients received corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day. Sirolimus and CsA were concentration controlled; trough levels of mycophenolic acid and prednisolone were also measured. Results. At 12 months, graft survival(92.5% sirolimus vs. 89.5% CsA), patient survival (97.5% sirolimus vs. 94.7% CsA), and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.5% sirolimus vs. 18.4% CsA) were not statistically different. The use of antibodies to treat suspected rejection episodes was also similar (7.5% sirolimus vs. 5.3% CsA). More sirolimus patients received bolus steroid therapy (20 vs. 11, P=0.068). From month 2 onward, the calculated glomerular filtration rate was consistently higher in sirolimus-treated patients. The adverse events reported more frequently with sirolimus were thrombocytopenia (45% vs. 8%) and diarrhea (38% vs. 11%). In the CsA group, increased creatinine (18% vs. 39%), hyperuricemia (3% vs. 18%), cytomegalovirus infection (5% vs. 21%), and tremor (5% vs. 21%) were observed significantly more often. Discussion. Patient and graft survival and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were comparable between sirolimus and CsA, whereas safety profiles were different. These data suggest that sirolimus may be used as primary therapy for the prevention of acute rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1260
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combination therapy of mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin in prevention of chronic renal allograft rejection in the rat
    Jolicoeur, EM
    Qi, SJ
    Xu, DS
    Dumont, L
    Daloze, P
    Chen, HF
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [22] Does Mycophenolate Mofetil Decrease the Recurrent Acute Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients
    Aneesh Srivastava
    Vishwajeet Singh
    Devendra Kumar
    Anant Kumar
    R K Sharma
    [J]. International Urology and Nephrology, 2005, 37 : 615 - 619
  • [23] Control of antidonor antibody production with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with chronic rejection
    Theruvath, TP
    Saidman, SL
    Mauiyyedi, S
    Delmonico, FL
    Williams, WW
    Tolkoff-Rubin, N
    Collins, AB
    Colvin, RB
    Cosimi, AB
    Pascual, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [24] Successful reversal of acute vascular rejection and cyclosporine-associated nephrotoxicity in renal allograft with combined sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as immunotherapy
    Oldakowska-Jedynak, U
    Paczek, L
    Mucha, K
    Foroncewicz, B
    Perkowska-Ptasinska, A
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (01) : 66 - 68
  • [25] Mycophenolate mofetil, ATG, and cyclosporine in the induction treatment of renal transplant recipients minimizes the incidence of acute rejection episodes
    Puig, JM
    Lloveras, J
    Fernandez-Crespo, P
    Mir, M
    Marcas, LI
    Manresa, JM
    Masramón, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (05) : 2226 - 2227
  • [26] A placebo controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the prevention of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients: 1-year results
    Marsh, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (01): : 33 - 33
  • [27] Use of mycophenolate mofetil for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantationEin neues Immunsuppressivum*
    S. Carl
    M. Wiesel
    G. Staehler
    [J]. Der Urologe A, 1998, 37 : 282 - 286
  • [28] Pharmacodynamic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal allograft recipients
    Budde, K
    Braun, KP
    Glander, P
    Böhler, T
    Hambach, P
    Fritsche, L
    Waiser, J
    Mai, I
    Neumayer, HH
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1748 - 1750
  • [29] Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for renal allograft recipients
    Roth, D
    Colona, J
    Burke, GW
    Ciancio, G
    Esquenazi, V
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (02) : 248 - 252
  • [30] The use of mycophenolate mofetil suspension in pediatric renal allograft recipients
    Bunchman, T
    Navarro, M
    Broyer, M
    Sherbotie, J
    Chavers, B
    Tönshoff, B
    Birk, P
    Lerner, G
    Lirenman, D
    Greenbaum, L
    Walker, R
    Zimmerhackl, LB
    Blowey, D
    Clark, G
    Ettenger, R
    Arterburn, S
    Klamerus, K
    Fong, A
    Tang, H
    Thomas, S
    Ramos, E
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2001, 16 (12) : 978 - 984