Sirolimus in association with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients

被引:452
|
作者
Kreis, H
Cisterne, JM
Land, W
Wramner, L
Squifflet, JP
Abramowicz, D
Campistol, JM
Morales, JM
Grinyo, JM
Mourad, G
Berthoux, FC
Brattström, C
Lebranchu, Y
Vialtel, P
机构
[1] Hop Necker Enfants Malad, Serv Reanimat & Transplantat, F-75747 Paris, France
[2] CHU Rangueil, F-31054 Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Munich, Grossenharden Clin, Munich, Germany
[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Clin Univ St Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[6] Hop Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Hosp 12 Octubre, E-28041 Madrid, Spain
[9] CHU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
[10] Hop Nord St Etienne, St Etienne, France
[11] Bellvitge Hosp, Barcelona, Spain
[12] Karolinska Inst, Huddinge Hosp, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[13] CHU Bretonneau, F-37044 Tours, France
[14] Hop Albert Michallon, Grenoble, France
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-200004150-00009
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. A previous trial in renal transplantation comparing sirolimus (rapamycin) to cyclosporine (CsA) ina triple-drug therapy regimen with azathioprine and corticosteroids found that the incidence of acute rejection was similar (approximately 40%) with a trend for better renal function with sirolimus. Methods. In 14 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus (n=40) or CsA (n=38) in an open-label design. All patients received corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day. Sirolimus and CsA were concentration controlled; trough levels of mycophenolic acid and prednisolone were also measured. Results. At 12 months, graft survival(92.5% sirolimus vs. 89.5% CsA), patient survival (97.5% sirolimus vs. 94.7% CsA), and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.5% sirolimus vs. 18.4% CsA) were not statistically different. The use of antibodies to treat suspected rejection episodes was also similar (7.5% sirolimus vs. 5.3% CsA). More sirolimus patients received bolus steroid therapy (20 vs. 11, P=0.068). From month 2 onward, the calculated glomerular filtration rate was consistently higher in sirolimus-treated patients. The adverse events reported more frequently with sirolimus were thrombocytopenia (45% vs. 8%) and diarrhea (38% vs. 11%). In the CsA group, increased creatinine (18% vs. 39%), hyperuricemia (3% vs. 18%), cytomegalovirus infection (5% vs. 21%), and tremor (5% vs. 21%) were observed significantly more often. Discussion. Patient and graft survival and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were comparable between sirolimus and CsA, whereas safety profiles were different. These data suggest that sirolimus may be used as primary therapy for the prevention of acute rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1260
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION IN PRIMARY CADAVERIC RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS
    SOLLINGER, HW
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (03) : 225 - 232
  • [2] Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on the prevention of acute renal allograft rejection
    Miladipour, AH
    Ghods, AJ
    Nejadgashti, H
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (06) : 2089 - 2090
  • [3] Prospective study of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in living donor renal allograft recipients
    Park, K
    Kim, SI
    Moon, JI
    Kim, YS
    Kim, MS
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (07) : 3575 - 3575
  • [4] Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in renal graft recipients treated with sirolimus.
    Buchler, M
    Beneton, M
    Lemeur, Y
    Westeel, PF
    Heng, AE
    Idier, I
    Lebranchu, Y
    Paintaud, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 254 - 255
  • [5] Sirolimus is effective for prevention of acute rejection in primary mismatched renal allograft recipients
    Ponticelli, C
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1031 - 1032
  • [6] Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of a first acute renal allograft rejection
    Pescovitz, MD
    Conti, D
    Greenstein, SM
    Inokuchi, S
    Rosenthal, J
    Cohen, D
    Stiller, C
    Pirsch, J
    Tomlanovich, S
    Cho, S
    Deierhoi, M
    Ferguson, R
    Gonwa, T
    Hodge, E
    Keown, PA
    Ramos, E
    Navarro, MT
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (02) : 235 - 241
  • [7] A single center experience with mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of renal allograft rejection
    Behrend, M
    Luck, R
    Kothe, P
    Pichlmayr, R
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (06) : 3110 - 3111
  • [8] Synergistic effects of mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus in prevention of acute heart, pancreas, and kidney allograft rejection and in reversal of ongoing heart allograft rejection in the rat
    Vu, MD
    Qi, S
    Xu, D
    Wu, J
    Peng, J
    Daloze, P
    Sehgal, S
    Leduc, B
    Chen, H
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) : 1575 - 1580
  • [9] Use of mycophenolate mofetil for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation
    Carl, S
    Wiesel, M
    Staehler, G
    [J]. UROLOGE-AUSGABE A, 1998, 37 (03): : 282 - 286
  • [10] Reduction in the incidence of early rejection in cadaveric renal allograft recipients treated with ATGAM induction and sequential mycophenolate mofetil
    Florence, LS
    Howard, DR
    Chapman, PH
    Lieberman, J
    Perkinson, DT
    Marks, WH
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (1-2) : 313 - 314