Two-level proportional hazards models

被引:13
|
作者
Maples, JJ
Murphy, SA
Axinn, WG
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Methodol Ctr, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Stat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Stat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Sociol, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA
关键词
EM algorithm; frailty model; hazard model; multilevel; profile likelihood; random coefficient; semiparametric likelihood; survival analysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00754.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We extend the proportional hazards model to a two-level model with a random intercept term and random coefficients. The parameters in the multilevel model are estimated by a combination of EM and Newton-Raphson algorithms. Even for samples of 50 groups, this method produces estimators of the fixed effects coefficients that are approximately unbiased and normally distributed. Two different methods, observed information and profile likelihood information, will be used to estimate the standard errors. This work is motivated by the goal of understanding the determinants of contraceptive use among Nepalese women in the Chitwan Valley Family Study (Axinn, Barber, and Chimire, 1997). We utilize a two-level hazard model to examine how education and access to education for children covary with the initiation of permanent contraceptive use.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 763
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR ADDITIVE HAZARDS AND PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS
    MCKEAGUE, IW
    UTIKAL, KJ
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 1991, 18 (03) : 177 - 195
  • [42] Plotting adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models: A comparison of two methods
    Ghali, WA
    Quan, H
    Morris, CM
    Brant, R
    Knudtson, ML
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) : 490 - 490
  • [43] Joint models for efficient estimation in proportional hazards regression models
    Slasor, P
    Laird, N
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (13) : 2137 - 2148
  • [44] Multi-level and two-level models of the decay out of superdeformed bands
    Sargeant, AJ
    Hussein, MS
    Wilson, AN
    [J]. NUCLEI AND MESOSCOPIC PHYSICS, 2005, 777 : 46 - 54
  • [45] Capturing Multi-level Models in a Two-Level Formal Modeling Technique
    Almeida, Joao Paulo A.
    Musso, Fernando A.
    Carvalho, Victorio A.
    Fonseca, Claudenir M.
    Guizzardi, Giancarlo
    [J]. CONCEPTUAL MODELING, ER 2019, 2019, 11788 : 43 - 51
  • [46] The Sensitivity Analysis of Two-Level Hierarchical Linear Models to Outliers
    Wang, Jue
    Lu, Zhenqiu
    Cohen, Allan S.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 140 : 307 - 320
  • [47] Two-Level Dynamic Structural Equation Models with Small Samples
    McNeish, Daniel
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2019, 26 (06) : 948 - 966
  • [48] A Tutorial on Centering in Cross-Sectional Two-Level Models
    Myers, Nicholas D.
    Brincks, Ahnalee M.
    Beauchamp, Mark R.
    [J]. MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2010, 14 (04) : 275 - 294
  • [49] Two-level interacting boson models beyond the mean field
    Arias, Jose M.
    Dukelsky, Jorge
    Garcia-Ramos, Jose Enrique
    Vidal, Julien
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2007, 75 (01):
  • [50] Finite Population Correction for Two-Level Hierarchical Linear Models
    Lai, Mark H. C.
    Kwok, Oi-man
    Hsiao, Yu-Yu
    Cao, Qian
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 23 (01) : 94 - 112