Prioritizing desalination strategies using multi-criteria decision analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Afify, Assem [1 ]
机构
[1] Strateg Res Unit, El Kanater 13621, Qalyoubia, Egypt
关键词
Water resources; Desalination; Multi-criteria analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2009.03.005
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Desalination of seawater and brackish water is gaining interest as a viable source of water in several and countries where conventional water resources are very limited or under stress due to the increasing demands and deteriorating water quality. In Egypt, quite a few large desalination plants exist with capacity over 10,000 m(3)/day. Most desalination plants are constructed on a small scale to satisfy domestic requirements for small cities and resorts in remote areas. National plans for future desalination facilities should consider different priorities of desalination options considering key factors such as the targeted use of desalinated water, feed water quality, desalination technology, energy source, plants' locations, and their capacities. The objective of this paper is to make a comparison among all the possible desalination alternatives for Egypt, considering key factors involved and using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Geographic Information Systems (GIS) was utilized along with MCDA to present results of the different desalination alternatives and optional plans at a national scale. The results of this study will direct decision makers concerning the prioritized investments of different desalination options and plans. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:928 / 935
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling the context in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Labreuche, Christophe
    [J]. NEW DIMENSIONS IN FUZZY LOGIC AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 303 - 310
  • [42] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Didenko, Vladimir
    Gritsyuk, Sergey
    Sullivan, Terry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2015, 8 (03) : 467 - 489
  • [43] Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Praveen Thokala
    Guruprasad Madhavan
    [J]. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [44] Biases and Debiasing in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Montibeller, Gilberto
    von Winterfeldt, Detlof
    [J]. 2015 48TH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS), 2015, : 1218 - 1226
  • [45] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS IN ONCOLOGY: AN OVERVIEW
    Adunlin, G.
    Diaby, V
    Montero, A.
    Xiao, H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A184 - A184
  • [46] Potential Nondominance in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Podinovski, Vladislav
    Nelyubin, Andrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2024, 23 (03) : 1401 - 1422
  • [47] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [48] Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis
    Durbach, Ian N.
    Stewart, Theodor J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [49] Multi-criteria decision making on the energy supply configuration of autonomous desalination units
    Georgiou, Dimitris
    Mohammed, Essam Sh.
    Rozakis, Stelios
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 75 : 459 - 467
  • [50] Multi-Criteria Decision Making for the Selection of Best Practice Seawater Desalination Technologies
    AbdulBaki, Dunia
    Mansour, Fatima
    Yassine, Ali
    Al-Hindi, Mahmoud
    Abou Najm, Majdi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN WATER-ENERGY-NEXUS NATURE-BASED SOLUTIONS, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES AND BEST PRACTICES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, : 489 - 492