Authorship in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Gadjradj, Pravesh S. [1 ]
Jalimsing, Mamta [1 ,2 ]
Jalimsing, Sandhia [1 ,2 ]
Voigt, Istifari [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Med Ctr, Univ Neurosurg Ctr Holland UNCH, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Fac Med, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Authorship; Guidelines; Oral and maxillofacial surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-021-01538-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background and Objective According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), authorship should be offered based on fulfilling four criteria. Honorary authorship (HA) is a term used for authors enlisted who did not fulfill these criteria. The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of HA in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Material and Methods In 2020, a twenty-two question survey was sent to corresponding authors of four high-impact journals in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The survey covered (1) demographics, (2) awareness of authorship guidelines and decision-making of authorship, and (3) honorary authorship. Results The response rate was 24.8%. Of the respondents, 81.1% was aware of the issue of guidelines on authorship, while 56.3% was aware of the issue of HA. Yet, 15.5% of the respondents felt that one or more of their co-authors did not deserve authorship based on the ICMJE-guidelines. Conclusion Based on the estimated proportions of HA, attempts should be made by universities, medical journals and individual researchers to further reduce authorship misuse.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 335
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条