Shale gas: a life-cycle perspective for UK production

被引:12
|
作者
Tagliaferri, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Clift, Roland [3 ]
Lettieri, Paola [1 ]
Chapman, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Chem Engn Dept, Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7JE, England
[2] Adv Plasma Power, Unit B2,Marston Gate,South Marston Business Pk, Swindon SN3 4DE, Wilts, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm Strategy, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
来源
关键词
Life-cycle assessment; UK fracking; UK shale gas exploitation; Water life cycle of shale gas; NATURAL-GAS; WATER-CONSUMPTION; MARCELLUS SHALE; UNITED-STATES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; METHANE EMISSIONS; PROCESS EQUIPMENT; PRODUCTION SITES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WELL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1207-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Following the boom of shale gas production in the USA and the decrease in the US gas prices, increasing interest in shale gas is developing in many countries holding shale reserves and exploration is already taking place in some EU countries, including the UK. Any commercial development of shale gas in Europe requires a broad environmental assessment, recognizing the different European conditions and legislations. Methods This study focuses on the UK situation and estimates the environmental impacts of shale gas using life-cycle assessment (LCA); the burdens of shale gas production in the UK are compared with the burdens of the current UK natural gas mix. The main focus is on the analysis of water impacts, but a broad range of other impact categories are also considered. A sensitivity analysis is performed on the most environmentally criticized operations in shale gas production, including flowback disposal and emission control, by considering a range of possible process options. Results and discussion Improper waste water management and direct disposal or spills of waste water to river can lead to high water and human ecotoxicity. Mining of the sand and withdrawal of the water used in fracking fluids determine the main impacts on water use and degradation. However, the water degradation of the conventional natural gas supply to the UK is shown to be even higher than that of shale gas. For the global warming potential (GWP), the handling methods of the emissions associated with the hydraulic fracturing influence the results only when emissions are vented. Finally, the estimated ultimate recovery of the well has the greatest impact on the results as well as the flowback ratio and flowback disposal method. Conclusions This paper provides insights to better understand the future development of shale gas in the UK. Adequate waste water management and emission handling significantly reduce the environmental impacts of shale gas production. Policy makers should consider that shale gas at the same time increases the water consumption and decreases the water degradation when compared with the gas mix supply. Furthermore, the environmental impacts of shale gas should be considered according to the low productivity that force the drilling and exploitation of a high number of wells.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 937
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] LIFE-CYCLE PROFITS INSTEAD OF LIFE-CYCLE COSTS
    BAZOVSKY, I
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1974, 7 (02): : 377 - 382
  • [42] Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
    de Jong, Sierk
    Antonissen, Kay
    Hoefnagels, Ric
    Lonza, Laura
    Wang, Michael
    Faaij, Andre
    Junginger, Martin
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
  • [43] Additive Manufacturing and PSS: a Solution Life-Cycle Perspective
    Zanetti, Vittorio
    Cavalieri, Sergio
    Pezzotta, Giuditta
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (12): : 1573 - 1578
  • [44] Popular Support for Environmental Protection: A Life-Cycle Perspective
    Geys, Benny
    Heggedal, Tom-Reiel
    Sorensen, Rune J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (03) : 1348 - 1355
  • [45] Which IC is more important? A life-cycle perspective
    Liang, Chiung-Ju
    Lin, Ying-Li
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2008, 9 (01) : 62 - +
  • [46] SOCIAL-POLICY AND LIFE-CYCLE - DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVE
    HIRSCHHORN, L
    [J]. SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1977, 51 (03) : 434 - 450
  • [47] Managing DP System Software - A Life-cycle Perspective
    Smogeli, Oyvind
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (16): : 324 - 334
  • [48] The balance of intergenerational family transfers: a life-cycle perspective
    Mudrazija, Stipica
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2014, 11 (03) : 249 - 259
  • [49] Life-Cycle Perspective on Residential Water Conservation Strategies
    Racoviceanu, Alina I.
    Karney, Bryan W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2010, 16 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [50] Energy Technology Assessment of Shale Gas 'Fracking' - A UK Perspective
    Hammond, Geoffrey P.
    O'Grady, Aine
    Packham, David E.
    [J]. CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 : 2764 - 2771