Shale gas: a life-cycle perspective for UK production

被引:12
|
作者
Tagliaferri, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Clift, Roland [3 ]
Lettieri, Paola [1 ]
Chapman, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Chem Engn Dept, Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7JE, England
[2] Adv Plasma Power, Unit B2,Marston Gate,South Marston Business Pk, Swindon SN3 4DE, Wilts, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm Strategy, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
来源
关键词
Life-cycle assessment; UK fracking; UK shale gas exploitation; Water life cycle of shale gas; NATURAL-GAS; WATER-CONSUMPTION; MARCELLUS SHALE; UNITED-STATES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; METHANE EMISSIONS; PROCESS EQUIPMENT; PRODUCTION SITES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WELL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1207-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Following the boom of shale gas production in the USA and the decrease in the US gas prices, increasing interest in shale gas is developing in many countries holding shale reserves and exploration is already taking place in some EU countries, including the UK. Any commercial development of shale gas in Europe requires a broad environmental assessment, recognizing the different European conditions and legislations. Methods This study focuses on the UK situation and estimates the environmental impacts of shale gas using life-cycle assessment (LCA); the burdens of shale gas production in the UK are compared with the burdens of the current UK natural gas mix. The main focus is on the analysis of water impacts, but a broad range of other impact categories are also considered. A sensitivity analysis is performed on the most environmentally criticized operations in shale gas production, including flowback disposal and emission control, by considering a range of possible process options. Results and discussion Improper waste water management and direct disposal or spills of waste water to river can lead to high water and human ecotoxicity. Mining of the sand and withdrawal of the water used in fracking fluids determine the main impacts on water use and degradation. However, the water degradation of the conventional natural gas supply to the UK is shown to be even higher than that of shale gas. For the global warming potential (GWP), the handling methods of the emissions associated with the hydraulic fracturing influence the results only when emissions are vented. Finally, the estimated ultimate recovery of the well has the greatest impact on the results as well as the flowback ratio and flowback disposal method. Conclusions This paper provides insights to better understand the future development of shale gas in the UK. Adequate waste water management and emission handling significantly reduce the environmental impacts of shale gas production. Policy makers should consider that shale gas at the same time increases the water consumption and decreases the water degradation when compared with the gas mix supply. Furthermore, the environmental impacts of shale gas should be considered according to the low productivity that force the drilling and exploitation of a high number of wells.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 937
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shale gas: a life-cycle perspective for UK production
    Carla Tagliaferri
    Roland Clift
    Paola Lettieri
    Chris Chapman
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 919 - 937
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of shale gas in the UK
    Tagliaferri, C.
    Lettieri, P.
    Chapman, C.
    [J]. CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 : 2706 - 2712
  • [3] Life cycle environmental impacts of UK shale gas
    Stamford, Laurence
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 134 : 506 - 518
  • [4] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum
    Burnham, Andrew
    Han, Jeongwoo
    Clark, Corrie E.
    Wang, Michael
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    Palou-Rivera, Ignasi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) : 619 - 627
  • [5] Life-cycle deliquification techniques and their application for deep shale gas reservoirs
    Zhang, Huali
    Chen, Jiaxiao
    Ye, Changqing
    Zhang, Xiaotao
    Yu, Fan
    Du, Anqi
    [J]. NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY B, 2023, 10 (04) : 333 - 340
  • [6] Process Based Life-Cycle Assessment of Natural Gas from the Marcellus Shale
    Dale, Alexander T.
    Khanna, Vikas
    Vidic, Radisav D.
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (10) : 5459 - 5466
  • [7] Life-cycle production optimization of hydrocarbon fields: thermoeconomics perspective
    Farajzadeh, R.
    Kahrobaei, S. S.
    de Zwart, A. H.
    Boersma, D. M.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS, 2019, 3 (11) : 3050 - 3060
  • [8] JOBS AND THE BUSINESS LIFE-CYCLE IN THE UK
    GALLAGHER, CC
    STEWART, H
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 1986, 18 (08) : 875 - 900
  • [9] Life-cycle prices and production
    Aguiar, Mark
    Hurst, Erik
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (05): : 1533 - 1559
  • [10] The impact of the UK household life-cycle transitions on the electricity and gas usage patterns
    Chalal, Moulay Larbi
    Benachir, Medjdoub
    White, Michael
    Shahtahmassebi, Golnaz
    Cumberbatch, Miranda
    Shrahily, Raid
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 : 505 - 518