Confidence Interval or P-Value? Part 4 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications

被引:369
|
作者
du Prel, Jean-Baptist [1 ]
Hommel, Gerhard [2 ]
Roehrig, Bernd [2 ]
Blettner, Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Zentrum Kinder & Jugendmed, Zentrum Pravent Padiat Mainz, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Med Biometrie Epidemiol & Informat, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL | 2009年 / 106卷 / 19期
关键词
publications; clinical research; p-value; statistics; confidence interval; BASIC STATISTICS; CLINICIAN;
D O I
10.3238/arztebl.2009.0335
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: An understanding of p-values and confidence intervals is necessary for the evaluation of scientific articles. This article will inform the reader of the meaning and interpretation of these two statistical concepts. Methods: The uses of these two statistical concepts and the differences between them are discussed on the basis of a selective literature search concerning the methods employed in scientific articles. Results/Conclusions: P-values in scientific studies are used to determine whether a null hypothesis formulated before the performance of the study is to be accepted or rejected. In exploratory studies, p-values enable the recognition of any statistically noteworthy findings. Confidence intervals provide information about a range in which the true value lies with a certain degree of probability, as well as about the direction and strength of the demonstrated effect. This enables conclusions to be drawn about the statistical plausibility and clinical relevance of the study findings. It is often useful for both statistical measures to be reported in scientific articles, because they provide complementary types of information. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106(19): 335-9 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0335
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 339
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The evaluation of the p-value as an estimator for the null hypothesis in the exponential distribution
    Babadi, Masoumeh
    Hormozinejad, Farshin
    Zaherzadeh, Ali
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2024, 53 (06) : 2633 - 2644
  • [42] Contribution to the discussion of "A critical evaluation of the current "p-value controversy"'
    De Santis, Fulvio
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (05) : 877 - 879
  • [43] Descriptive Statistics The Specification of Statistical Measures and Their Presentation in Tables and Graphs Part 7 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications
    Spriestersbach, Albert
    Roehrig, Bernd
    du Prel, Jean-Baptist
    Gerhold-Ay, Aslihan
    Blettner, Maria
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 106 (36): : 578 - 583
  • [44] Fixed b subsampling and the block bootstrap: improved confidence sets based on p-value calibration
    Shao, Xiaofeng
    Politis, Dimitris N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2013, 75 (01) : 161 - 184
  • [45] Cluster-Randomized Studies Part 25 of a Series on Evaluating Scientific Publications
    Lorenz, Eva
    Koepke, Sascha
    Pfaff, Holger
    Blettner, Maria
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 115 (10): : 163 - 168
  • [46] Is p-value < 0.05 enough? A study on the statistical evaluation of classifiers
    Neumann, Nadine M.
    Plastino, Alexandre
    Pinto Junior, Jony A.
    Freitas, Alex A.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2020, 36
  • [47] Accuracy Evaluation of the Unified P-Value from Combining Correlated P-Values
    Alves, Gelio
    Yu, Yi-Kuo
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [48] Contribution to the discussion of the paper by Stefan Wellek: "A critical evaluation of the current p-value controversy"
    Farcomeni, Alessio
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (05) : 880 - 881
  • [49] Systematic Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Part 6 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications Who Assesses the Quality of Systematic Reviews?
    Jongen, Johannes
    Kahlke, Volker
    Petersen, Sven
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 107 (04): : 57 - 57
  • [50] Are p-values under attack? Contribution to the discussion of "A critical evaluation of the current "p-value controversy"'
    Piegorsch, Walter W.
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (05) : 889 - 891