Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

被引:133
|
作者
Nelson, Bradford [1 ]
Kaufman, Melissa [1 ]
Broughton, Gregory [1 ]
Cookson, Michael S. [1 ]
Chang, Sam S. [1 ]
Herrell, S. Duke [1 ]
Baumgartner, Roxelyn G. [1 ]
Smith, Joseph A., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2007年 / 177卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; prostatectomy; adverse effects; prostatic neoplasms; robotics;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity and length of stay for a number of surgical procedures. Furthermore, length of stay after open radical prostatectomy has decreased dramatically during the last decade. We examined differences in length of stay between a prospectively evaluated cohort of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Between January 2003 and March 2006, 1,003 radical prostatectomies were performed at our hospital. Data were collected in prospective fashion and a comparison was made between 374 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and 629 who underwent robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Length of stay, factors influencing length of stay, readmission rates and unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were evaluated. Patients in the 2 groups were treated using the same clinical care pathway. Results: Overall 94.3% of patients in the radical retropubic prostatectomy group and 97.5% in the robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group were discharged home on or before postoperative day 1. Mean length of stay in the radical retropubic and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy groups was 1.25 (median 1.09) and 1.17 days (median 1.03), which was similar and not statistically different (p = 0.27). Readmission rates were similar in robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy patients (7% and 5%, respectively, p = 0.12). Unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were the same in the robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy groups (10%, p = 0.95). Conclusions: Patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy or robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy can be treated on the same clinical pathway. A targeted hospital discharge date of postoperative day I can be achieved in the majority of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Readmission rates or unscheduled hospital visits are necessary in a small percent of patients treated with an early discharge program, of which the majority are caused by ileus.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 931
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of 90-Day Readmission Rates Between Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ku, P.
    Chung, S.
    Keller, J.
    Lin, H.
    Huang, C.
    Chen, Y.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S101 - S101
  • [22] Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Ergin, Giray
    Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
    Kirac, Mustafa
    Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
    Kopru, Burak
    Keseroglu, Bugra Bilge
    Hoscan, Mustafa Burak
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (01): : 83 - 88
  • [23] Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Likelihood of Positive Surgical Margin(s)
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Weinberg, Aaron C.
    Kacker, Ravi
    Hirsch, Michelle S.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) : 1097 - 1101
  • [24] Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy
    Parsons, J. Kellogg
    Bennett, J. Lisette
    UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (02) : 412 - 416
  • [25] Robotic radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Menon, M
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 91 (03) : 175 - 176
  • [26] Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy
    Lorenz, Judith
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2022, 53 (03) : 220 - 220
  • [27] A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    D'Alonzo, Richard C.
    Gan, Tong J.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Albala, David M.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Sun, Leon
    Dahm, Philipp
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2009, 21 (05) : 322 - 328
  • [28] COMPARISON OF EXTRAPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND OPEN RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AT RAMATHIBODI HOSPITAL, THAILAND: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW
    Kongchareonsombat, Wisoot
    Tantirangsri, Nakorn
    Leenanupund, Chareon
    Kochakarn, Wachira
    Chaimuengraj, Suchart
    Patcharatrakul, Suthep
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A90 - A90
  • [29] Charge and length of hospital stay analysis of radical retropubic prostatectomy and transperineal prostate brachytherapy
    Wagner, TT
    Young, D
    Bahnson, RR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (04): : 1216 - 1218
  • [30] Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy Techniques: Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted
    Frota, Rodrigo
    Turna, Burak
    Barros, Rodrigo
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2008, 34 (03): : 259 - 268