Mapping spatial variation in surface soil water content: comparison of ground-penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry

被引:96
|
作者
Huisman, JA [1 ]
Snepvangers, JJJC [1 ]
Bouten, W [1 ]
Heuvelink, GBM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Geoecol Res, ICG, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
soil moisture; ground-penetrating radar; time domain reflectometry; spatial variation;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00239-1
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Mapping soil water content (SWC) is a difficult but important task in many fields, such as hydrology, agronomy and soil science. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a valuable technique to measure surface SWC at an intermediate scale in between the scales of time domain reflectometry (TDR) and remotely sensed data. To measure SWC with GPR, the surface soil permittivity was determined with the ground wave velocity. The first aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of GPR to measure spatial SWC variation. The second aim was to compare GPR and TDR with respect to the type of spatial SWC structures that can be measured by these methods. A spatial structure in SWC was created by heterogeneous irrigation with sprinklers of various intensities. Then spatial SWC variation was measured with both GPR and TDR. The experiment showed that GPR is well able to measure spatial SWC variation as expressed by the variogram. The larger measurement volume of GPR filtered out small-scale spatial variation (< 1.5 m) and the large number of easily acquired GPR measurements resulted in well-defined and smooth experimental variograms. A comparison of interpolated SWC maps before and after irrigation showed that GPR is better suited than TDR for mapping large-scale features (> 5 m) in SWC. Especially the boundaries between areas with different SWC were better resolved in case of GPR because of the large number of GPR measurements obtained with the same measurement effort. Small-scale features (< 5 m) were not mapped adequately by either GPR or TDR. However, the chance of detecting small-scale features in SWC mapping at the field scale is higher for GPR, simply because of the higher sampling density. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 207
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potential of ground-penetrating radar to calibrate electromagnetic induction for shallow soil water content estimation
    Pathirana, Sashini
    Lambot, Sebastien
    Krishnapillai, Manokararajah
    Smeaton, Christina
    Cheema, Mumtaz
    Galagedara, Lakshman
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 633
  • [32] Estimation of the near surface soil water content during evaporation using air-launched ground-penetrating radar
    Moghadas, Davood
    Jadoon, Khan Zaib
    Vanderborght, Jan
    Lambot, Sebastien
    Vereecken, Harry
    NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2014, 12 (05) : 623 - +
  • [33] Mapping water pipeline leakage by ground-penetrating radar diffraction imaging
    Liu, Yu
    Shi, Zhanjie
    GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 87 (04) : WB1 - WB7
  • [34] Ground-penetrating radar for monitoring the distribution of near-surface soil water content in the Gurbantünggüt Desert
    Yanfang Qin
    Xi Chen
    Kefa Zhou
    Patrick Klenk
    Kurt Roth
    Li Sun
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 70 : 2883 - 2893
  • [35] Characterization of tillage effects on the spatial variation of soil properties using ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction
    Jonard, Francois
    Mahmoudzadeh, Mohammad
    Roisin, Christian
    Weihermueller, Lutz
    Andre, Frederic
    Minet, Julien
    Vereecken, Harry
    Lambot, Sebastien
    GEODERMA, 2013, 207 : 310 - 322
  • [36] Water content and porosity estimated from ground-penetrating radar and resistivity
    Turesson, Anita
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 58 (02) : 99 - 111
  • [37] Determination of volumetric water content of concrete using ground-penetrating radar
    Klysz, G.
    Balayssac, J. -P.
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2007, 37 (08) : 1164 - 1171
  • [38] Comparison of soil water content estimation equations using ground penetrating radar
    Anbazhagan, P.
    Bittelli, Marco
    Pallepati, Rao Raghuveer
    Mahajan, Puskar
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 588
  • [39] Estimation of ground cavity configurations using ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry
    Hong, Won-Taek
    Lee, Jong-Sub
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 92 (03) : 1789 - 1807
  • [40] Estimation of ground cavity configurations using ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry
    Won-Taek Hong
    Jong-Sub Lee
    Natural Hazards, 2018, 92 : 1789 - 1807