New Equation for Optimal Insulation Dependency on the Climate for Office Buildings

被引:2
|
作者
Ahmed, Kaiser [1 ,2 ]
Kurnitski, Jarek [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Civil Engn, POB 12100, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
[2] Granlund Oy, POB 59, FI-00701 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Tallinn Univ Technol, Smart City Ctr Excellence, Ehitajate Tee 5, EE-19086 Tallinn, Estonia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
conductance; climate correction; economic insulation thickness; NZEB office building; THERMAL INSULATION; THICKNESS; DESIGN; WALLS; ZONES;
D O I
10.3390/en14020321
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The comparison of building energy efficiency in different climates is a growing issue. Unique structural solutions will not ensure the same energy use, but the differences also remain if cost-optimal solutions are applied. This study developed a new equation for the assessment of building envelope optimal insulation in different climates for office buildings. The developed method suggests determining actual degree days from simulated heating energy need and the thermal conductance of a building, avoiding in such a way the use of a base temperature. The method was tested in four climates and validated against cost-optimal solutions solved with optimization. The accuracy of the method was assessed with sensitivity analyses of key parameters such as window-to-wall ratios (WWRs), window g-values, costs of heating, and electricity. These results showed that the existing square root equation overestimated the climate difference effect so that the calculation from the cold climate U-value resulted in less insulation than cost-optimal in warmer climates. Parametric analyses revealed that the power value of 0.2 remarkably improved the accuracy as well as performance worked well in all cases and can be recommended as a default value. Sensitivity analyses with a broad range of energy costs and window parameters revealed that the developed equation resulted in maximum 5% underestimation and maximum 7% overestimation of an average area-weighted optimal U-value of building envelope in another climate. The developed method allows objectively to compare optimal insulation of the building envelope in different climates. The method is easy to apply for energy performance comparison of similar buildings in different climates and also for energy performance requirements comparison.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OPTIMAL FINANCIAL CHOICES FOR THE INSULATION OF BUILDINGS
    WOOD, RJ
    OCALLAGHAN, PW
    PROBERT, SD
    APPLIED ENERGY, 1979, 5 (03) : 193 - 204
  • [2] Absolute sustainability of New Zealand office buildings in the context of climate targets
    Bullen, L.
    McLaren, S. J.
    Dowdell, D.
    Chandrakumar, C.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 205
  • [3] Ecologically optimal insulation thicknesses for residential buildings
    Wohlgemuth, Daniela
    von Gunten, Dimitri
    Zeyer, Christian
    Althaus, Hans-Joerg
    Manz, Heinrich
    BAUPHYSIK, 2015, 37 (05) : 277 - +
  • [4] Optimal clothing insulation in naturally ventilated buildings
    Wang, Lijuan
    Kim, Jungsoo
    Xiong, Jing
    Yin, Haiguo
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 154 : 200 - 210
  • [5] Optimum level of insulation for energy efficient envelope of office buildings
    Batra, U.
    Singhal, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 14 (11) : 2389 - 2398
  • [6] Optimal positioning of phase change material and insulation through numerical investigations to reduce cooling loads in office buildings
    Arumugam, Pappu
    Ramalingam, Velraj
    Vellaichamy, Pandiyarajan
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2022, 52
  • [7] Optimum level of insulation for energy efficient envelope of office buildings
    U. Batra
    S. Singhal
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2017, 14 : 2389 - 2398
  • [8] NEW INSULATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE WIRING
    LOAN, LD
    SALMON, WA
    BELL LABORATORIES RECORD, 1972, 50 (08): : 239 - &
  • [9] A global survey of adverse energetic effects of increased wall insulation in office buildings: degree day and climate zone indicators
    Friess, Wilhelm A.
    Rakhshan, Kambiz
    Davis, Michael P.
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2017, 10 (01) : 97 - 116
  • [10] A global survey of adverse energetic effects of increased wall insulation in office buildings: degree day and climate zone indicators
    Wilhelm A. Friess
    Kambiz Rakhshan
    Michael P. Davis
    Energy Efficiency, 2017, 10 : 97 - 116