Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods

被引:288
|
作者
van der Werf, HMG [1 ]
Petit, J [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Sol Agron & Spatialisat Rennes Quimper, ENSAR, F-35042 Rennes, France
关键词
agroecosystems; diagnosis; environmental impact; evaluation methods; farm level; indicators; production practices; sustainability;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00354-1
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
An increasing variety of evaluation methods is being proposed to address the question of the environmental impacts of agriculture. This paper compares and analyses 12 indicator-based approaches to assessing environmental impact at the farm level, in order to propose a set of guidelines for the evaluation or development of such methods. These methods take into account a number of environmental objectives (e.g. soil erosion, water quality). A set of indicators is used to quantify the degree to which these objectives are attained. A total of 26 objectives were taken into account by one or several of the methods. A great diversity in breadth of analysis exists: the number of objectives considered per method varies from 2 to 13. Indicator-based methods for environmental evaluation at the farm level should take into account a range of objectives covering both local and global effects. Indicators based on the environmental effects of farmer practices are preferable to indicators based on farmer practices as the link with the objective is direct and the choice of means is left to the farmer. Indicators based on farmer practices cost less in data collection but do not allow an actual evaluation of environmental impact. Indicators allowing expression of impacts both per unit surface and per unit product are preferable. Indicators producing output in the form of values are preferred to indicators producing scores. If possible, science-based threshold values should be defined for indicators. The method should be validated with respect to (a) the appropriateness of its set of objectives relative to its purpose and (b) its indicators. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 145
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comprehensive evaluation study of a wind farm project based on cloud model and network-level analysis
    Li, Wei
    Zhang, Yi
    Journal of Information and Computational Science, 2013, 10 (18): : 6013 - 6022
  • [32] Evaluation of environmental impact of construction waste disposal based on fuzzy set analysis
    Kong, Lingji
    Ma, Biao
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2020, 19
  • [33] Comparison of SPECT Cerebral Images Examination Methods Based on Luminance Level and Morphological Spectra Evaluation
    Przytulska, Malgorzata
    Kulikowski, Juliusz L.
    Bajera, Adam
    Krolicki, Leszek
    BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (01) : 29 - 42
  • [34] Comparison of Analysis Methods for the Joint Connection-Level and Packet-Level Performance Evaluation of VoIP Traffic Networks
    Ramirez-Reyna, Mario A.
    Cruz-Perez, Felipe A.
    Lirio Castellanos-Lopez, Sandra
    Hernandez-Valdez, Genaro
    IEEE Access, 2024, 12 : 163349 - 163366
  • [35] The analysis and comparison of carrier-based PWM methods for 3-level inverter
    Kim, DH
    Kang, DW
    Lee, YH
    Hyun, DS
    IECON 2000: 26TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES AND INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES, 2000, : 1316 - 1321
  • [36] The environmental impact of permanent meadows-based farms: A comparison among different dairy farm management systems of an Italian cheese
    Rencricca, Giulia
    Froldi, Federico
    Moschini, Maurizio
    Trevisan, Marco
    Ghnimi, Sami
    Lamastra, Lucrezia
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 37 : 53 - 64
  • [37] Evaluation of the environmental impact of Brownfield remediation options: comparison of two life cycle assessment-based evaluation tools
    Cappuyns, Valerie
    Kessen, Bram
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 33 (21) : 2447 - 2459
  • [38] A COMPARISON OF RESPONSE-BASED ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTOUR METHODS FOR FPSO GREEN WATER ASSESSMENT
    Wang, Shuo
    Wang, Xin
    Woo, Wai Lok
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 37TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 1, 2018,
  • [39] Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators
    Boulay, Anne-Marie
    Motoshita, Masaharu
    Pfister, Stephan
    Bulle, Cecile
    Munoz, Ivan
    Franceschini, Helen
    Margni, Manuele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (01): : 139 - 160
  • [40] Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators
    Anne-Marie Boulay
    Masaharu Motoshita
    Stephan Pfister
    Cécile Bulle
    Ivan Muñoz
    Helen Franceschini
    Manuele Margni
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 139 - 160