Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods

被引:288
|
作者
van der Werf, HMG [1 ]
Petit, J [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Sol Agron & Spatialisat Rennes Quimper, ENSAR, F-35042 Rennes, France
关键词
agroecosystems; diagnosis; environmental impact; evaluation methods; farm level; indicators; production practices; sustainability;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00354-1
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
An increasing variety of evaluation methods is being proposed to address the question of the environmental impacts of agriculture. This paper compares and analyses 12 indicator-based approaches to assessing environmental impact at the farm level, in order to propose a set of guidelines for the evaluation or development of such methods. These methods take into account a number of environmental objectives (e.g. soil erosion, water quality). A set of indicators is used to quantify the degree to which these objectives are attained. A total of 26 objectives were taken into account by one or several of the methods. A great diversity in breadth of analysis exists: the number of objectives considered per method varies from 2 to 13. Indicator-based methods for environmental evaluation at the farm level should take into account a range of objectives covering both local and global effects. Indicators based on the environmental effects of farmer practices are preferable to indicators based on farmer practices as the link with the objective is direct and the choice of means is left to the farmer. Indicators based on farmer practices cost less in data collection but do not allow an actual evaluation of environmental impact. Indicators allowing expression of impacts both per unit surface and per unit product are preferable. Indicators producing output in the form of values are preferred to indicators producing scores. If possible, science-based threshold values should be defined for indicators. The method should be validated with respect to (a) the appropriateness of its set of objectives relative to its purpose and (b) its indicators. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 145
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level
    Marchand, Fleur
    Debruyne, Lies
    Triste, Laure
    Gerrard, Catherine
    Padel, Susanne
    Lauwers, Ludwig
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (03):
  • [2] The Use of Reference Values in Indicator-Based Methods for the Environmental Assessment of Agricultural Systems
    Acosta-Alba, Ivonne
    van der Werf, Hayo M. G.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (02): : 424 - 442
  • [3] Utilizing Indicator-Based Methods: 'Measuring the Impact of a Science Center on its Community'
    Falk, John H.
    Needham, Mark D.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2016, 53 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [4] Application of key frameworks to an indicator-based evaluation of environmental health in Latin America and the Caribbean
    Schuetz, Gabriel
    Hacon, Sandra
    Silva, Hilton
    Moreno Sanchez, Ana Rosa
    Nagatani, Kakuko
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 24 (04): : 276 - 285
  • [5] A comparison and evaluation of key performance indicator-based multivariate statistics process monitoring approaches
    Zhang, Kai
    Hao, Haiyang
    Chen, Zhiwen
    Ding, Steven X.
    Peng, Kaixiang
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2015, 33 : 112 - 126
  • [6] An indicator-based approach to assess village-level social and biophysical vulnerability of agriculture communities in Uttarakhand, India
    Roopam Shukla
    Kamna Sachdeva
    Pawan Kumar Joshi
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13 : 2260 - 2271
  • [7] An indicator-based approach to assess village-level social and biophysical vulnerability of agriculture communities in Uttarakhand,India
    Roopam SHUKLA
    Kamna SACHDEVA
    Pawan Kumar JOSHI
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2016, 13 (12) : 2260 - 2271
  • [8] An indicator-based approach to assess village-level social and biophysical vulnerability of agriculture communities in Uttarakhand, India
    Shukla, Roopam
    Sachdeva, Kamna
    Joshi, Pawan Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2016, 13 (12) : 2260 - 2271
  • [9] Environmental consequences of adaptation to climate change in Swiss agriculture: An analysis at farm level
    Tendall, Danielle M.
    Gaillard, Gerard
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 132 : 40 - 51
  • [10] Indicator-Based Evolutionary Level Set Approximation: Mixed Mutation Strategy and Extended Analysis
    Liu, Lai-Yee
    Basto-Fernandes, Vitor
    Yevseyeva, Iryna
    Kok, Joost
    Emmerich, Michael
    NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL COMPUTATION FOR BIOMEDICINE AND NEUROSCIENCE, PT I, 2017, 10337 : 146 - 159