Participatory systematic mapping as a tool to identify gaps in ecosystem services research: insights from a Baltic Sea case study

被引:10
|
作者
Kuhn, Tinka K. [1 ]
Oinonen, Soile [2 ]
Trentlage, Jennifer [1 ]
Riikonen, Simo [2 ]
Vikstrom, Suvi [2 ]
Burkhard, Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Phys Geog & Landscape Ecol, Schneiderberg 50, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Finnish Environm Inst, Latokartanonkaari 11, Helsinki 00790, Finland
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Coastal-marine management; Decision making; Evidence synthesis; HELCOM region; Literature review; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; ECONOMIC VALUATION; COASTAL; MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; INTEGRATION; INDICATORS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101237
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Evidence-based decision making and policy development rely on the syntheses of available scientific knowledge and the identification of respective knowledge gaps. This article presents a participatory systematic map, which constitutes a relatively new methodological approach in the field of ecosystem services (ES) research. The map identifies, collates, and describes the evidence base on marine and coastal ES research in the Baltic Sea. Key stakeholders were involved throughout the whole mapping process. 1006 publications, identified through searches in eleven databases, were double-screened and 57 publications were found eligible. The results show that research on provisioning, regulating and cultural ES is uniformly distributed in the evidence base while most studies applied bio-physical assessment approaches. The most frequently researched ES are the regulation of nutrients, the provision of fish, and recreation. Only a few studies were conducted in the context of marine policies. While ES research is growing in the Baltic Sea area, this systematic map highlights the plethora of definitions and lack of standardized approaches as an obstacle for policy implementation. The method of participatory systematic mapping was identified as a useful tool for ES research to identify all available knowledge on a specific topic, determine knowledge gaps and inform both researchers and policy makers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] THE USE OF PARTICIPATORY MAPPING IN ETHNOBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, BIOCULTURAL CONSERVATION, AND COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT: A CASE STUDY FROM THE PERUVIAN AMAZON
    Gilmore, Michael P.
    Young, Jason C.
    JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY, 2012, 32 (01) : 6 - 29
  • [22] An Ecosystem Services Valuation Research Framework for Policy Integration in Developing Countries: A Case Study from Nepal
    Acharya, Ram Prasad
    Maraseni, Tek Narayan
    Cockfield, Geoff
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (19)
  • [23] Are farmers willing to pay for participatory climate information services? Insights from a case study in peri-urban Khulna, Bangladesh
    Paparrizos, Spyridon
    Kumar, Uthpal
    Amjath-Babu, T. S.
    Ludwig, Fulco
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2021, 23
  • [24] How Does Paying for Ecosystem Services Contribute to Sustainable Development? Evidence from Case Study Research in Germany and the UK
    Nicolaus, Kristin
    Jetzkowitz, Jens
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (05) : 3019 - 3042
  • [25] A catchment-based approach to mapping hydrological ecosystem services using riparian habitat: A case study from the Wet Tropics, Australia
    Pert, P. L.
    Butler, J. R. A.
    Brodie, J. E.
    Bruce, C.
    Honzak, M.
    Kroon, F. J.
    Metcalfe, D.
    Mitchell, D.
    Wong, G.
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) : 378 - 388
  • [26] Power analysis as a tool to analyse trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest management: A case study from nine European countries
    Juerges, Nataly
    Arts, Bas
    Masiero, Mauro
    Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke
    Borges, Jose G.
    Brodrechtova, Yvonne
    Brukas, Vilis
    Canadas, Maria Joao
    Carvalho, Pedro Ochoa
    Corradini, Giulia
    Corrigan, Edwin
    Felton, Adam
    Karahalil, Uzay
    Karakoc, Ugur
    Krott, Max
    van Laar, Jim
    Lodin, Isak
    Lundholm, Anders
    Makrickiene, Ekaterina
    Marques, Marlene
    Mendes, Americo
    Mozgeris, Gintautas
    Novais, Ana
    Pettenella, Davide
    Pivoriunas, Nerijus
    Sari, Burak
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 49
  • [27] Offshore benthic habitat mapping based on object-based image analysis and geomorphometric approach. A case study from the Slupsk Bank, Southern Baltic Sea
    Janowski, Lukasz
    Wroblewski, Radoslaw
    Dworniczak, Janusz
    Kolakowski, Mateusz
    Rogowska, Karolina
    Wojcik, Michal
    Gajewski, Juliusz
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 801
  • [28] Offshore benthic habitat mapping based on object-based image analysis and geomorphometric approach. A case study from the Slupsk Bank, Southern Baltic Sea
    Janowski, Lukasz
    Wroblewski, Radoslaw
    Dworniczak, Janusz
    Kolakowski, Mateusz
    Rogowska, Karolina
    Wojcik, Michal
    Gajewski, Juliusz
    Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 801
  • [29] Nearshore Benthic Habitat Mapping Based on Multi-Frequency, Multibeam Echosounder Data Using a Combined Object-Based Approach: A Case Study from the Rowy Site in the Southern Baltic Sea
    Janowski, Lukasz
    Trzcinska, Karolina
    Tegowski, Jaroslaw
    Kruss, Aleksandra
    Rucinska-Zjadacz, Maria
    Pocwiardowski, Pawel
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (12)