Agrometeorological crop yield forecasting methods

被引:0
|
作者
Gommes, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UN, Food Agr Org, I-00100 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This paper presents an introduction to agrometeorological crop yield forecasting (ACYF) methods. Such methods attempt to quantitatively assess the effect of weather vagaries on regional crop yields before harvest. The paper insists on the fact that all ACYF approaches are eventually calibrated against traditional yield statistics obtained through sampling procedures. Three methods are covered: descriptive methods, regression methods and crop simulation methods. Descriptive methods simply classify weather conditions according to one or several variables to identify conventional thresholds separating groups of significantly different yields. Regression methods derive equations relating crop yield with weather variables. Finally, simulation methods, the most complex ones currently in use, attempt to analytically describe the physical and physiological impact of environment and management conditions on crop development, growth and yield. A large section of the paper deals with methodological options and questions. Most of them are linked with the differences in temporal and spatial scales of the model inputs and outputs, and apply equally to the three methods. Inputs cover a large spectrum of data sources and types, from weather stations (points) and satellites (pixels) to soils (polygons) and direct crop observations at the field level. The integration of the data requires techniques of aggregation and dis-aggregation which are now available, although their implementation is fraught with methodological problems. In practice, methods will be selected based on their performance under a range of different conditions and their cost of implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 141
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Empirical Analysis for Crop Yield Forecasting in India
    S. Dharmaraja
    Vidyottama Jain
    Priyanka Anjoy
    Hukum Chandra
    [J]. Agricultural Research, 2020, 9 : 132 - 138
  • [22] Methods of forecasting walnut yield
    Prunet, JP
    Ginibre, T
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL WALNUT SYMPOSIUM, 2001, (544): : 565 - 572
  • [23] A Markov chain model of crop conditions and intrayear crop yield forecasting
    Stokes, J. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2024, 43 (03) : 583 - 592
  • [24] Crop yield forecasting on the Canadian Prairies by remotely sensed vegetation indices and machine learning methods
    Johnson, Michael D.
    Hsieh, William W.
    Cannon, Alex J.
    Davidson, Andrew
    Bedard, Frederic
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2016, 218 : 74 - 84
  • [25] Using Satellite Information in Agrometeorological Forecasting
    Strashnaya, A. I.
    Bereza, O. V.
    [J]. RUSSIAN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY, 2021, 46 (12) : 872 - 880
  • [26] Can Agrometeorological Indices of Adverse Weather Conditions Help to Improve Yield Prediction by Crop Models?
    Lalic, Branislava
    Eitzinger, Josef
    Thaler, Sabina
    Vucetic, Visnjica
    Nejedlik, Pavol
    Eckersten, Henrik
    Jacimovic, Goran
    Nikolic-Djoric, Emilija
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2014, 5 (04): : 1020 - 1041
  • [27] Interpretability of deep learning models for crop yield forecasting
    Paudel, Dilli
    de Wit, Allard
    Boogaard, Hendrik
    Marcos, Diego
    Osinga, Sjoukje
    Athanasiadis, Ioannis N.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 206
  • [28] A Study on Crop Yield Forecasting Using Classification Techniques
    Sujatha, R.
    Devi, P. Isakki
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES AND INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING (ICCTIDE'16), 2016,
  • [29] Use of ordinal logistic regression in crop yield forecasting
    Kumari, Vandita
    Agrawal, Ranjana
    Kumar, Amrender
    [J]. MAUSAM, 2016, 67 (04): : 913 - 918
  • [30] Yield and Price Forecasting for Stochastic Crop Decision Planning
    Kantanantha, Nantachai
    Serban, Nicoleta
    Griffin, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2010, 15 (03) : 362 - 380