Multicenter Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV Test

被引:56
|
作者
Mostafa, Heba H. [1 ]
Carroll, Karen C. [1 ]
Hicken, Rachel [1 ]
Berry, Gregory J. [2 ]
Manji, Ryhana [2 ]
Smith, Elizabeth [2 ]
Rakeman, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Fowler, Randal C. [3 ]
Leelawong, Mindy [3 ]
Butler-Wu, Susan M. [4 ]
Quintero, David [4 ]
Umali-Wilcox, Minette [4 ]
Kwiatkowski, Robert W. [5 ]
Persing, David H. [5 ]
Weir, Fred [5 ]
Loeffelholz, Michael J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Zucker SOM Hofstra Northwell, Northwell Hlth Labs, East Garden City, NY USA
[3] NYC Publ Hlth Lab, Dept Hlth & Mental Hyg, New York, NY USA
[4] Keck Sch Med USC, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
关键词
Cepheid; SARS-CoV-2; influenza; flu; RSV; 4-plex; INFLUENZA-VIRUS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.02955-20
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
With the approach of respiratory virus season in the Northern Hemisphere, clinical microbiology and public health laboratories will need rapid diagnostic assays to distinguish severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections for diagnosis and surveillance. In this study, the clinical performance of the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for nasopharyngeal swab specimens was evaluated in four centers: Johns Hopkins Medical Microbiology Laboratory, Northwell Health Laboratories, NYC Public Health Laboratory, and Los Angeles County/University of Southern California (LAC1USC) Medical Center. A total of 319 nasopharyngeal swab specimens, positive for SARS- CoV-2 (n = 75), influenza A virus (n = 65), influenza B virus (n = 50), or RSV (n = 38) or negative (n = 91) by the standard-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests at each site, were tested using the Cepheid panel test. The overall positive percent agreement for the SARS-CoV-2 target was 98.7% (n = 74/75), and the negative agreement was 100% (n = 91), with all other analytes showing 100% total agreement (n = 153). Standard-of-care tests to which the Cepheid panel was compared included the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2, Cepheid Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV, GenMark ePlex respiratory panel, BioFire respiratory panel 2.1 and v1.7, DiaSorin Simplexa COVID-19 Direct, and Hologic Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 assays. The Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV test showed high sensitivity and accuracy for all analytes included in the test. This test will provide a valuable clinical diagnostic and public health solution for detecting and differentiating SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B virus, and RSV infections during the current respiratory virus season.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the automated cartridge-based ARIES SARS-CoV-2 Assay (RUO) against automated Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR as gold standard
    Tanida, Konstantin
    Koste, Lars
    Koenig, Christian
    Wenzel, Werner
    Fritsch, Andreas
    Frickmann, Hagen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (03): : 156 - 164
  • [22] Recommendations for sample pooling on the Cepheid GeneXpert(R) system using the Cepheid Xpert(R) Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay
    Becker, Michael G.
    Taylor, Tracy
    Kiazyk, Sandra
    Cabiles, Dana R.
    Meyers, Adrienne F. A.
    Sandstrom, Paul A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [23] Parallel testing of 241 clinical nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus on the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 and the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 assays
    Tham, Jason Wei Ming
    Ng, Shu Chi
    Chai, Chean Nee
    Png, Siyu
    Tan, Eunice Jia Min
    Ng, Li Jie
    Chua, Rui Ping
    Sani, Musa
    Chiang, Donald
    Tan, Ker Xin
    Tee, Nancy Wen Sim
    Jureen, Roland
    Tan, Shaun S.
    Yan, Gabriel
    Yan, Benedict
    Lee, Chun Kiat
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 59 (02) : E45 - E48
  • [24] Clinical Evaluation of BioFire COVID-19 Test, BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays for Sample-to-Answer Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Park, Joonhong
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, Jaehyeon
    Hong, Ki Ho
    [J]. GENES, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [25] Comparison of Cepheid Xpert Xpress and Abbott ID Now to Roche cobas for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Smithgall, Marie C.
    Scherberkova, Ioana
    Whittier, Susan
    Green, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 128
  • [26] Presumptive positive with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay due to N mutations in the Delta variant
    Choi, Hosoon
    Hwang, Munok
    Lukey, Janell
    Jinadatha, Chetan
    Navarathna, Dhammika H.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 103 (03)
  • [27] Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens
    Granato, Paul A.
    Kimball, Simon R.
    Alkins, Brenda R.
    Cross, Deirdre C.
    Unz, Melissa M.
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [28] Comparative evaluation of the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 combo kit with the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens
    Paul A. Granato
    Simon R. Kimball
    Brenda R. Alkins
    Deirdre C. Cross
    Melissa M. Unz
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 21
  • [29] Comparative practicability and analytical performances of Credo VitaPCR™ Flu A&B and Cepheid Xpert® Xpress Flu/RSV platforms
    Bouassa, Ralph-Sydney Mboumba
    Tonen-Wolyec, Serge
    Rodary, Julien
    Belec, Laurent
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 100 (04)
  • [30] The Diagnostic Accuracy of Xpert Xpress to SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review
    Cao, Xun-Jie
    Fang, Ke-Ying
    Li, Ya-Ping
    Zhou, Jie
    Guo, Xu-Guang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 301