Temporal Prediction of Motion Parameters with Interchangeable Motion Models

被引:4
|
作者
Heithausen, Cordula [1 ]
Meyer, Maria [1 ]
Blaeser, Max [1 ]
Ohm, Jens-Rainer [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Nachrichtentech, Melatener Str 23, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1109/DCC.2017.30
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
While the translational motion model remains predominant in motion compensation, better coding efficiency can be achieved by applying a higher order motion model in cases of non-translationally moving video content. But so far, temporal motion vector prediction has not been fully optimized in case of higher order motion compensation. In particular, if the motion model provided by the reference picture differs from the motion model of the current block, the temporal prediction is either not used at all or it is sub-optimal. Also, temporal predictors of a much smaller partition size might not provide the best suited motion parameter prediction to a larger current block. In order to overcome these issues, a new method of temporal motion prediction is introduced in this paper, allowing for flexible switching between motion models. The picture-wise dense translational motion vector field is calculated from both translational and higher order motion parameters with a configurable granularity of 4x4 pixel subpartitions down to pixelwise accuracy. Both a translational and a higher order motion parameter predictor are estimated from that vector field, thus giving the current block two alternatives to choose from. The proposed algorithm achieves rate reductions of about 2% on average compared to the previous higher order motion compensation system it is based on, now resulting in an average of around 20% efficiency gain for non-translational video content, compared to HEVC without such an option.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 409
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Temporal estimation in prediction motion tasks is biased by a moving destination
    Flavell, Jonathan C.
    Barrett, Brendan T.
    Buckley, John G.
    Harris, Julie M.
    Scally, Andrew J.
    Beebe, Nathan B.
    Cruickshank, Alice G.
    Bennett, Simon J.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2018, 18 (02):
  • [42] Temporal prediction and differential coding of motion vectors in the MCTF framework
    Turaga, DS
    van der Schaar, M
    Pesquet-Popescu, B
    2003 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 57 - 60
  • [43] Human Motion Prediction via Spatio-Temporal Inpainting
    Ruiz, A. Hernandez
    Gall, J.
    Moreno-Noguer, F.
    2019 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV 2019), 2019, : 7133 - 7142
  • [44] Temporal Convolutions for Multi-Step Quadrotor Motion Prediction
    Looper, Samuel
    Waslander, Steven L.
    2022 19TH CONFERENCE ON ROBOTS AND VISION (CRV 2022), 2022, : 32 - 39
  • [45] TEMPORAL IMAGE SEQUENCE PREDICTION USING MOTION FIELD INTERPOLATION
    NIEWEGLOWSKI, J
    HAAVISTO, P
    SIGNAL PROCESSING-IMAGE COMMUNICATION, 1995, 7 (4-6) : 333 - 353
  • [46] Localization with dynamic motion models - Determining motion model parameters dynamically in Monte Carlo Localization
    Milstein, Adam
    Wang, Tao
    ICINCO 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS: ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 2006, : 120 - 127
  • [47] Machine learning prediction models for ground motion parameters and seismic damage assessment of buildings at a regional scale
    Bhatta S.
    Kang X.
    Dang J.
    Resilient Cities and Structures, 2024, 3 (01): : 84 - 102
  • [48] Prediction of ground motion parameters for the volcanic area of Mount Etna
    Tusa, Giuseppina
    Langer, Horst
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2016, 20 (01) : 1 - 42
  • [49] Prediction of ground motion parameters using randomized ANFIS (RANFIS)
    Thomas, Sonia
    Pillai, G. N.
    Pal, Kirat
    Jagtap, Pushpak
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 40 : 624 - 634
  • [50] Prediction of ground motion parameters for the volcanic area of Mount Etna
    Giuseppina Tusa
    Horst Langer
    Journal of Seismology, 2016, 20 : 1 - 42