Fault diagnosis with matrix analysis for electrically actuated unmanned aerial vehicles

被引:7
|
作者
Kladis, G. P. [2 ]
Economou, J. T. [2 ]
Tsourdos, A. [1 ]
White, B. A. [1 ]
Knowles, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Dept Informat & Sensors, Autonomous Syst Grp, Def Acad United Kingdom, Swindon SN6 8LA, Wilts, England
[2] Cranfield Univ, IPEL, Aeromech Syst Grp, Dept Engn Syst & Management,Def Acad United Kingd, Swindon SN6 8LA, Wilts, England
关键词
fault-tree; diagnosis; digraphs; graph theory; adjacency matrix; fault path; pseudo-boolean function; cut set; path set; reliability; SYSTEM FAILURES; ALGORITHM; MODELS; TREES;
D O I
10.1243/09544100JAERO422
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Because of their large operational potential, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be required to perform over long periods of time, which might lead to potential degradation or even failure of their electrical or/and mechanical control Surfaces and components. Consequently, the least failure can degrade the performance of the process and might lead to a catastrophic event. Therefore, an efficient mechanism should be capable of making these faults realizable and act accordingly so that a performance index is continuously maintained. However, even when a fault is detected at the monitoring phase, as illustrated in a previous work by Kladis and Economou [1], it is important to determine the cause or combination of causes of that failure through a root-event analysis in order to proceed to its elimination from further expansion. In addition, if the system is not recoverable as in the case of a UAV crashing at a remote area, then post analysis for diagnosing the possible cause(s) of the catastrophic failure is carried Out in order to improve reliability issues. Hence prior knowledge is cumulated in order to define, identify, and evaluate the risk and perform decision making so as to improve future missions. Among many interesting methodologies used for a qualitative and quantitative analysis for fault assessment fault-tree analysis has been widely used. Particularly for complex systems actuators, control surfaces and components are associated in a complicated manner and all signals are gathered in a supervisory control panel. Hence the determination of a cause of a potential failure can be obtained through multiple different investigations of checkpoints. Hence the problem becomes twofold. Not only is it necessary to acquire the cause of a fault but also its investigation Should be performed in the most efficient manner of minimum sense. In this article potential causes that lead to a failure are investigated through a digraph analysis utilizing graph theory tools and pseudo-boolean expressions, motivated by a previous work [2]. The benefits Of Such a formulation afford the ability of handling system interdependencies, redundancies, determining primary causes of failure (cut sets), critical importance of these, and so on. A generic scenario for fault assessment in a UAV application illustrates the methodology proposed. In addition, a quantitative and qualitative analysis is also included, thus describing reliability aspects of the system. The resulting time optimum solution is obtained by the use of shortest path algorithms, due to the means by which the problem is posed and its similarity to routing problems. Then during quantitative analysis, algorithms for determining all fault modes are used. In addition, mathematical formulation and its relevance are also addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 563
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unmanned aerial vehicles
    Scarpa, F
    [J]. AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 73 (04): : 401 - 402
  • [22] Reliability and Maintenance Analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Petritoli, Enrico
    Leccese, Fabio
    Ciani, Lorenzo
    [J]. SENSORS, 2018, 18 (09)
  • [23] Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Crowd Monitoring and Analysis
    Husman, Muhammad Afif
    Albattah, Waleed
    Abidin, Zulkifli Zainal
    Mustafah, Yasir Mohd.
    Kadir, Kushsairy
    Habib, Shabana
    Islam, Muhammad
    Khan, Sheroz
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (23)
  • [24] Analysis of Data Harvesting by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Choi, Chang-sik
    Baccelli, Francois
    de Veciana, Gustavo
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2019, : 121 - 125
  • [25] Analysis of propulsion systems of unmanned aerial vehicles
    Adamski, Miroslaw
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 16 (04): : 291 - 297
  • [26] Time-Domain Frequency Estimation With Application to Fault Diagnosis of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Blade Damage
    Zhang, Xiao
    Luo, Hao
    Li, Kuan
    Kaynak, Okyay
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2022, 69 (05) : 5257 - 5266
  • [27] Aerial Robotics and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Ollero, Anibal
    Valavanis, Kimon
    Chen, Yangquan
    [J]. IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2018, 25 (04) : 96 - 97
  • [28] A Hybrid Fault Diagnosis and Recovery for a Team of Unmanned Vehicles
    Tousi, M. M.
    Aghdam, A. G.
    Khorasani, K.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (SOSE), 2008, : 386 - 391
  • [29] Unsupervised Fault Detection on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Encoding and Thresholding Approach
    Park, Kyung Ho
    Park, Eunji
    Kim, Huy Kang
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (06) : 1 - 17
  • [30] Hierarchical Fault Detection and Diagnosis for Unmanned Ground Vehicles
    Lee, Sunho
    Yang, Seunghan
    Song, Bongsob
    [J]. ASCC: 2009 7TH ASIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 881 - 886