Immediate Versus Conventional Loading with Fixed Full-Arch Prostheses in Mandibles with Failing Dentition: A Prospective Controlled Study

被引:23
|
作者
Penarrocha-Oltra, David [1 ]
Covani, Ugo [2 ]
Penarrocha, Miguel [3 ]
Penarrocha-Diago, Maria [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg & Implantol, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Surg, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
关键词
controlled clinical trial; full-arch prosthesis; immediate loading; immediate implants; loading protocols; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; TILTED IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RISK-FACTORS; REHABILITATION; SURVIVAL; MAXILLA; RESTORATIONS; FRESH;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3534
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare immediate and conventional loading protocols for fixed full-arch mandibular prostheses supported by immediate and nonimmediate implants. Materials and Methods: A prospective controlled nonrandomized study with 12 months of follow-up included patients requiring fixed full-arch rehabilitations supported by immediate and nonimmediate implants. Eighteen patients were treated with conventional loading (control group), and 18 were treated with immediate loading (test group). Each patient received four to six implants; implants with insertion torque < 35 Ncm were excluded from the study and loaded conventionally. The following variables were assessed: implant success, biologic and prosthetic complications, success of the immediately loaded provisional prostheses, and marginal bone loss. Statistical analysis was performed with nonparametric tests (chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis) with an alpha value of.05. Results: Thirtysix patients consecutively enrolled in the study. Two control group patients failing to attend control visits and 12 implants that did not achieve an insertion torque of 35 Ncm were excluded. The final sample consisted of 34 patients and 183 implants (98 test and 85 control implants). Implant success rates were 99.0% (test) and 97.6% (control). Within the test group, success rates for immediate and nonimmediate implants were 100% and 97.6%, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant. All immediately loaded prostheses were successful. Five provisional fixed prostheses presented with loosened screws; all control group patients reported discomfort with the provisional denture. Average bone loss was 0.71 mm (standard deviation 0.25 mm) in the test group and 0.60 mm (standard deviation 0.28 mm) in the control group. Conclusion: No significant differences were seen in implant success and peri-implant marginal bone loss between immediate and conventional loading of mandibular fixed full-arch prostheses supported by immediate and nonimmediate implants. Biologic and prosthetic complications were rare, and all immediately loaded provisional fixed prostheses performed successfully.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 434
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Immediate Versus Conventional Loading with Fixed Full-Arch Prostheses in the Maxilla: A Nonrandomized Controlled Prospective Study
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria
    Canullo, Luigi
    Covani, Ugo
    Penarrocha, Miguel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (03) : 690 - 698
  • [2] Immediate Versus Conventional Loading of Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses in Mandibles with Failing Dentition: A Patient-Centered Controlled Prospective Study
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria
    Aloy-Prosper, Amparo
    Covani, Ugo
    Penarrocha, Miguel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2015, 28 (05) : 499 - 508
  • [3] Immediate loading of full-arch fixed prostheses supported by axial and tilted implants for the treatment of edentulous atrophic mandibles
    Agliardi, Enrico
    Clerico, Matteo
    Ciancio, Paolo
    Massironi, Domenico
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 41 (04): : 285 - 293
  • [4] Immediate loading with fixed full-arch prostheses in the maxilla: Review of the literature
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Covani, Ugo
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria
    [J]. MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2014, 19 (05): : E512 - E517
  • [5] Immediate implant placement in fresh sockets versus implant placement in healed bone for full-arch fixed prostheses with conventional loading
    Altintas, N. Y.
    Taskesen, F.
    Bagis, B.
    Baltacioglu, E.
    Cezairli, B.
    Senel, F. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (02) : 226 - 231
  • [6] Distal Cantilever in Full-Arch Prostheses and Immediate Loading: A Retrospective Clinical Study
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    Gupta, Bhumija
    Gaertner, Kathrin
    Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (02) : 427 - 431
  • [7] Immediate Loading of Immediate Mandibular Implants With a Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis: A Preliminary Study
    Penarrocha, Miguel
    Boronat, Araceli
    Garcia, Berta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (06) : 1286 - 1293
  • [8] Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous mandibles: a 3-year prospective study
    De Bruyn, H.
    de Velde, T. Van
    Collaert, B.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (07) : 717 - 723
  • [9] Level of Satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses:: Zygomatic versus conventional implants
    Penarrocha, Miguel
    Carrillo, Celia
    Boronat, Araceli
    Marti, Eva
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2007, 22 (05) : 769 - 773
  • [10] Immediate Versus Conventional Loading for the Maxilla with Implants Placed into Fresh and Healed Extraction Sites to Support a Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis: Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Study
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Covani, Ugo
    Aparicio, Arnau
    Ata-Ali, Javier
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (04) : 1116 - 1124