Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area

被引:148
|
作者
Ahtiainen, Juha P. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffren, Merja [1 ,2 ]
Hulmi, Juha J. [1 ,2 ]
Pietikainen, Mikko [1 ,2 ]
Mero, Antti A. [1 ,2 ]
Avela, Janne [1 ,2 ]
Hakkinen, Keijo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol Phys Activ, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Neuromuscular Res Ctr, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland
关键词
MRI; Resistance training; Muscle hypertrophy; Vastus lateralis; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; WOMEN; RELIABILITY; TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; HUMANS; VOLUME; FORCE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s00421-009-1211-6
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the "panoramic" brightness mode ultrasonography (US) method to detect training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) by comparison with results obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Out of 27 young male volunteers, 20 subjects were assigned to training group and seven to non-training control group. Muscle CSAs of vastus lateralis were analyzed by MRI and US before and after 21 weeks of either heavy resistance training or control period. Measured by both the US and MRI, the resistance training induced significant increases (similar to 13-14%, P < 0.001) in muscle CSA, whereas no changes were observed in control group. A high repeatability was found between the two consequent US measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC of 0.997) with standard error of measurement (SEM) of 0.38 cm(2) and smallest detectable difference of 1.1 cm(2). Validity of the US method against MRI in assessing CSA of VL produced ICC of 0.905 and SEM of 0.87 cm(2) with high limits of agreement analyzed by Bland and Altman method. However, the MRI produced systematically (10 +/- A 4%, P < 0.01) larger CSA values than the US method. The US showed high agreement against MRI in detecting changes in muscle CSA (ICC of 0.929, SEM of 0.94 cm(2)). The results of this study showed that the panoramic US method provides repeatable measures of a muscle CSA although MRI produced larger absolute CSA values. Moreover, this US method detects training-induced changes in muscle CSA with a comparable degree of precision to MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 279
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Automated image analysis of skeletal muscle fiber cross-sectional area
    Mula, Jyothi
    Lee, Jonah D.
    Liu, Fujun
    Yang, Lin
    Peterson, Charlotte A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 114 (01) : 148 - 155
  • [12] Skeletal muscle fiber cross-sectional area: Effects of freezing procedures
    Roy, RR
    Pierotti, DJ
    Edgerton, VR
    ACTA ANATOMICA, 1996, 155 (02): : 131 - 135
  • [13] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY FOR MEASUREMENT OF HAMSTRING MUSCLE AND TENDON CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
    Kositsky, Adam
    Goncalves, Basilio A. M.
    Stenroth, Lauri
    Barrett, Rod S.
    Diamond, Laura E.
    Saxby, David J.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (01): : 55 - 63
  • [14] Changes in vastus lateralis fibre cross-sectional area, pennation angle and fascicle length do not predict changes in muscle cross-sectional area
    Ruple, Bradley A.
    Mesquita, Paulo H. C.
    Godwin, Joshua S.
    Sexton, Casey L.
    Osburn, Shelby C.
    McIntosh, Mason C.
    Kavazis, Andreas N.
    Libardi, Cleiton A.
    Young, Kaelin C.
    Roberts, Michael D.
    EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 107 (11) : 1216 - 1224
  • [15] Is the inclinometer a valid measure of thoracic kyphosis? A cross-sectional study
    Hunter, Donald J.
    Rivett, Darren A.
    McKiernan, Sharmain
    Weerasekara, Ishanka
    Snodgrass, Suzanne J.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 22 (04) : 310 - 317
  • [16] RELIABILITY AND LIMITS OF AGREEMENT OF THE SUPRASPINATUS MUSCLE ANATOMICAL CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA ASSESSMENT BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    Papatzika, Fyllis
    Papandreou, Maria
    Ekizos, Antonis
    Panteli, Chrystalla
    Arampatzis, Adamantios
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (07): : 1821 - 1826
  • [17] VASTUS LATERALIS MUSCLE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA ULTRASONOGRAPHY VALIDITY FOR IMAGE FITTING IN HUMANS
    Lixandrao, Manoel E.
    Ugrinowitsch, Carlos
    Bottaro, Martim
    Chacon-Mikahil, Mara P. T.
    Cavaglieri, Claudia R.
    Min, Li L.
    de Souza, Eduardo O.
    Laurentino, Gilberto C.
    Libardi, Cleiton A.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (11) : 3293 - 3297
  • [18] CHANGES IN UPPER ARM MUSCLE CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA WITH ENDURANCE TRAINING
    TURNER, D
    FERRETTI, G
    KAYSER, B
    SCHENA, F
    VOCK, P
    HOPPELER, H
    PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 419 (3-4): : R54 - R54
  • [19] Cross-sectional area reference values for nerve ultrasonography
    Cartwright, Michael S.
    Passmore, Leah V.
    Yoon, Joon-Shik
    Brown, Martine E.
    Caress, James B.
    Walker, Francis O.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2008, 37 (05) : 566 - 571
  • [20] THE SENSITIVITY OF MUSCLE FORCE PREDICTIONS TO CHANGES IN PHYSIOLOGICAL CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
    BRAND, RA
    PEDERSEN, DR
    FRIEDERICH, JA
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1986, 19 (08) : 589 - 596