Timing of Adverse Prostate Cancer Reclassification on First Surveillance Biopsy: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study

被引:15
|
作者
Macleod, Liam C. [1 ]
Ellis, William J. [1 ,3 ]
Newcomb, Lisa F. [1 ]
Zheng, Yingye [3 ]
Brooks, James D. [4 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [5 ]
Gleave, Martin E. [6 ]
Lance, Raymond S. [7 ]
Nelson, Peter S. [3 ]
Thompson, Ian M., Jr. [8 ]
Wagner, Andrew A. [9 ]
Wei, John T. [10 ]
Lin, Daniel W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Vet Affairs Hosp, Seattle Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[8] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[9] Beth Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[10] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2017年 / 197卷 / 04期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostate specific antigen; body mass index; biopsy; watchful waiting; RISK; GRADE; PROGRESSION; OUTCOMES; COHORT; SCORE; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.090
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: During active surveillance for localized prostate cancer, the timing of the first surveillance biopsy varies. We analyzed the Canary PASS (Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study) to determine biopsy timing influence on rates of prostate cancer adverse reclassification at the first active surveillance biopsy. Materials and Methods: Of 1,085 participants in PASS, 421 had fewer than 34% of cores involved with cancer and Gleason sum 6 or less, and thereafter underwent on-study active surveillance biopsy. Reclassification was defined as an increase in Gleason sum and/or 34% or more of cores with prostate cancer. First active surveillance biopsy reclassification rates were categorized as less than 8, 8 to 13 and greater than 13 months after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression determined association between reclassification and first biopsy timing. Results: Of 421 men, 89 (21.1%) experienced reclassification at the first active surveillance biopsy. Median time from prostate cancer diagnosis to first active surveillance biopsy was 11 months (IQR 7.8-13.8). Reclassification rates at less than 8, 8 to 13 and greater than 13 months were 24%, 19% and 22% (p = 0.65). On multivariable analysis, compared to men biopsied at less than 8 months the OR of reclassification at 8 to 13 and greater than 13 months were 0.88 (95% CI 0.5,1.6) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.5,1.9), respectively. Prostate specific antigen density 0.15 or greater (referent less than 0.15, OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1, 4.1) and body mass index 35 kg/m(2) or greater (referent less than 25 kg/m(2), OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1,5.7) were associated with increased odds of reclassification. Conclusions: Timing of the first active surveillance biopsy was not associated with increased adverse reclassification but prostate specific antigen density and body mass index were. In low risk patients on active surveillance, it may be reasonable to perform the first active surveillance biopsy at a later time, reducing the overall cost and morbidity of active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:1026 / 1033
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate cancer and active surveillance
    Abrahamsson, Per-Anders
    CONTROVERSIES IN THE TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER, 2008, 41 : 1 - 6
  • [32] Active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Shill, Daniela K.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Carlsson, Sigrid, V
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (06) : 2809 - 2819
  • [33] Active surveillance or prostate cancer
    Mottet, N.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2012, 14 (02) : 74 - 78
  • [34] Active surveillance of prostate cancer
    Bolenz, Christian
    Grimm, Marc-Oliver
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Kristiansen, Glen
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Schmidt, Stefanie
    Schostak, Martin
    Hadaschik, Boris
    UROLOGIE, 2025,
  • [35] Active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Graefen, M.
    Ahyai, S.
    Heuer, R.
    Salomon, G.
    Schlomm, T.
    Isbarn, H.
    Budaeus, L.
    Heinzer, H.
    Huland, H.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (03): : 261 - 269
  • [36] Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer
    Morash, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (06): : 1221 - 1221
  • [37] Active surveillance for early prostate cancer: Initial results
    Nicolai, Nicola
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Stagni, Silvia
    Righi, Laura Vera
    Donegani, Simona
    Villa, Sergio
    Valvo, Francesca
    Biasoni, Davide
    Catena, Laura
    Salvioni, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 467 - 467
  • [38] MRI-GUIDED BIOPSY IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Kinnaird, Adam
    Yerram, Nitin
    O'Connor, Luke
    Brisbane, Wayne
    Sharma, Vidit
    Chuang, Ryan
    Jayadevan, Rajiv
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Priester, Alan
    Delfin, Merdin
    Tran, Elizabeth
    Barsa, Danielle
    Sisk, Anthony
    Reiter, Robert
    Felker, Ely
    Raman, Steve
    Kwan, Lorna
    Choyke, Peter
    Merino, Maria
    Wood, Bradford
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter
    Marks, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E284 - E285
  • [39] Value of Transition Zone Biopsy in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Chung-Chieh
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1755 - 1759
  • [40] UTILITY OF ANTERIOR ZONE BIOPSY IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Glass, Allison
    Pugashetti, Neil
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Evans, Christopher P.
    Yap, Stanley A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E508 - E509