Representation and self-similarity of shapes

被引:47
|
作者
Geiger, D
Liu, TL
Kohn, RV
机构
[1] NYU, Courant Inst Math Sci, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Acad Sinica, Inst Informat Sci, Taipei 115, Taiwan
关键词
shape representation; self-similarity; variational matching; dynamic programming; MRF;
D O I
10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1159948
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Representing shapes in a compact and informative form is a significant problem for vision systems that must recognize or classify objects. We describe a compact representation model for two-dimensional (2D) shapes by investigating their self-similarities and constructing their shape axis trees (SA-trees). Our approach can be formulated as a variational one (or, equivalently, as MAP estimation of a Markov random field). We start with a 2D shape, its boundary contour, and two different parameterizations for the contour (one parameterization is oriented counterclockwise and the other clockwise). To measure its self-similarity, the two parameterizations are matched to derive the best set of one-to-one point-to-point correspondences along the contour. The cost functional used in the matching may vary and is determined by the adopted self-similarity criteria, e.g., cocircularity, distance variation, parallelism, and region homogeneity. The loci of middle points of the pairing contour points yield the shape axis and they can be grouped into a unique free tree structure, the SA-tree. By implicitly encoding the (local and global) shape information into an SA-tree, a variety of vision tasks, e.g., shape recognition, comparison, and retrieval, can be performed in a more robust and efficient way via various tree-based algorithms. A dynamic programming algorithm gives the optimal solution in O(N-4), where N is the size of the contour.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 99
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Self-similarity and protein compactness
    Moret, M. A.
    Santana, M. C.
    Zebende, G. F.
    Pascutti, P. G.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2009, 80 (04):
  • [42] General self-similarity: An overview
    Leinster, Tom
    [J]. Real and Complex Singularities, 2007, : 232 - 247
  • [43] A general theory of self-similarity
    Leinster, Tom
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS, 2011, 226 (04) : 2935 - 3017
  • [44] Damage and self-similarity in fracture
    Shcherbakov, R
    Turcotte, DL
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2003, 39 (03) : 245 - 258
  • [45] The self-similarity of the melanocortin system
    Peters, A
    [J]. ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 146 (02) : 529 - 531
  • [46] Self-similarity in rock physics
    Dvorkin, Jack
    [J]. Leading Edge (Tulsa, OK), 2007, 26 (08): : 946 - 950
  • [47] Self-Similarity, Operators and Dynamics
    Leonid Malozemov
    Alexander Teplyaev
    [J]. Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 2003, 6 : 201 - 218
  • [48] ON SELF-SIMILARITY OF CRACK LAYER
    BOTSIS, J
    KUNIN, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1987, 35 (03) : R51 - R56
  • [49] Self-Similarity Breeds Resilience
    Prasad, Sanjiva
    Zuck, Lenore D.
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, (222): : 30 - 44
  • [50] Constructing the Self-similarity Concept
    Rina Hershkowitz
    Tommy Dreyfus
    Michal Tabach
    [J]. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2023, 9 : 322 - 349