A real options perspective on R&D portfolio diversification

被引:26
|
作者
van Bekkum, Sjoerd [1 ]
Pennings, Enrico [2 ]
Smit, Han [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Sch Econ, Tinbergen Inst, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Sch Econ, Erasmus Res Inst Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Real options; Portfolio analysis; Research & Development; VALUATION; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper shows that the conditionality of investment decisions in R&D has a critical impact on portfolio risk, and implies that traditional diversification strategies should be reevaluated when a portfolio is constructed. Real option theory argues that research projects have conditional or option-like risk and return properties, and are different from unconditional projects. Although the risk of a portfolio always depends on the correlation between projects, a portfolio of conditional R&D projects with real option characteristics has a fundamentally different risk than a portfolio of unconditional projects. When conditional R&D projects are negatively correlated, diversification only slightly reduces portfolio risk. When projects are positively correlated, however, diversification proves more effective than conventional tools predict. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1158
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Valuation of options in R&D
    Pizmoht, P.
    Polajnar, A.
    Palcic, I.
    [J]. ANNALS OF DAAAM FOR 2005 & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL DAAAM SYMPOSIUM: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON YOUNG RESEARCHES AND SCIENTISTS, 2005, : 303 - 304
  • [22] Selection of R&D projects in a portfolio
    Linton, JD
    Walsh, ST
    Kirchhoff, BA
    Morabito, J
    Merges, M
    [J]. EMS - 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 IEEE ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT SOCIETY, 2000, : 506 - 511
  • [23] R&D Portfolio and Market Structure
    Kwon, Illoong
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2010, 120 (543): : 313 - 323
  • [24] Maximizing R&D portfolio value
    Kolisch, R
    Meyer, K
    Mohr, R
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2005, 48 (03) : 33 - 39
  • [25] Sustainable R&D portfolio assessment
    Vandaele, Nico J.
    Decouttere, Catherine J.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2013, 54 (04) : 1521 - 1532
  • [26] Pricing real abandonment options on several R&D investment projects
    Ming-Cheng Wu
    Simon H. Yen
    Kuo-Ren Lou
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2007, 11 : 1123 - 1129
  • [27] Uncertainty and the market valuation of R&D within a real options logic
    Oriani, Raffaele
    Sobrero, Mauriz
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (04) : 343 - 361
  • [28] Strategic R&D Investment: A Game Theoretic Real Options Approach
    Yu Dongping
    [J]. CCDC 2009: 21ST CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1547 - 1552
  • [29] The derivation of R&D return indicators within a real options framework
    Wörner, SD
    Grupp, H
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2003, 33 (03) : 313 - 325
  • [30] Real options valuation: the new frontier in R&D project evaluation?
    Perlitz, M
    Peske, T
    Schrank, R
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 1999, 29 (03) : 255 - 269