Cost-benefit analysis of retrofitting attic-integrated switchable insulation systems of existing US residential buildings

被引:16
|
作者
Dehwah, Ammar H. A. [1 ]
Krarti, Moncef [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Bldg Syst Program, Civil Environm & Architectural Engn Dept, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Attics; Residential buildings; Techno-economics; Switchable insulation systems; Dynamic insulation materials; Retrofit; ENERGY SAVINGS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.119840
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study evaluates the cost-benefit of retrofitting attic using switchable insulation systems (SISs) for existing US residential buildings. For the retrofit analysis, the SIS insulation, is operated using 2-step temperature based controls and its energy performance is compared to that achieved by static code-required insulation installed in attics of detached homes located in 44 US locations. The analysis results show significant correlations between source heating/cooling energy savings and degree-days as well as sol-air temperatures used as climate indicators for the US locations. In addition, it is found that the potential energy savings achieved by attic-integrated SIS insulation retrofit vary widely by climate ranging from 14 kWh/m(2) to 51 kWh/m(2). For all US locations, the analysis indicates that deploying the attic-integrated SIS can provide higher cost savings compared to static high R-value insulation. Based on a breakeven cost analysis, the annual energy cost savings when replacing the existing insulation with attic-integrated SIS range from $0.05/m(2) to $1.57/m(2) depending on the climate. The additional cost for the deployment of SIS insulation can be on average 55% more than the current static insulation US prices to ensure its cost-effectiveness as a retrofit measure for attics of US residential buildings. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Retrofitting houses with insulation: a cost-benefit analysis of a randomised community trial
    Chapman, R.
    Howden-Chapman, P.
    Viggers, H.
    O'Dea, D.
    Kennedy, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2009, 63 (04) : 271 - 277
  • [2] Cost-benefit analysis of traditional seismic retrofitting strategies integrated in the renovation of stone masonry buildings
    Maio, Rui
    Estevao, Joao M. C.
    Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
    Vicente, Romeu
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 206
  • [4] Cost-benefit analysis into integrated aquaponics systems
    Petrea, Stefan-Mihai
    Bandi, Alexandru-Cristian
    Cristea, Dragos
    Neculita, Mihaela
    [J]. CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2019, 15 (03): : 238 - 268
  • [5] A Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework for City-Scale Seismic Retrofitting Scheme of Buildings
    Tian, Yuan
    Ren, Jingyi
    Xu, Zhen
    Qi, Mingzhu
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [6] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Buildings Retrofitted Using GIB Systems
    Beigi, Hossein Agha
    Christopoulos, Constantin
    Sullivan, Timothy J.
    Calvi, Gian Michele
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2016, 32 (02) : 861 - 879
  • [7] Retrofitting Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS): A Cost-Benefit Analysis Appraisal
    Oladunjoye, Oluwayemi
    Proverbs, David
    Xiao, Hong
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [8] Cost-benefit analysis for Energy Efficiency Retrofit of existing buildings: A case study in China
    Liu, Yuming
    Liu, Tingting
    Ye, Sudong
    Liu, Yisheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 177 : 493 - 506
  • [9] Efficiency and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Seismic Strengthening Techniques for Old Residential Buildings in Lisbon
    Marques, Rui
    Lamego, Paula
    Lourenco, Paulo B.
    Sousa, Maria L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (09) : 1590 - 1625
  • [10] Upgrading Existing Buildings to Universal Design. What Cost-Benefit Analyses Can Tell Us
    Aslaksen, Finn
    [J]. UNIVERSAL DESIGN 2016: LEARNING FROM THE PAST, DESIGNING FOR THE FUTURE, 2016, 229 : 652 - 661