Cost-Benefit Analysis of Buildings Retrofitted Using GIB Systems

被引:5
|
作者
Beigi, Hossein Agha [1 ,2 ]
Christopoulos, Constantin [1 ]
Sullivan, Timothy J. [3 ]
Calvi, Gian Michele [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Civil Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, IUSS Pavia, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Pavia, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Via Palestro 3, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[4] IUSS Pavia, UME Sch, Pavia, Italy
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
FRAME; STORY; MITIGATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1193/110914EQS185M
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently, the gapped-inclined brace system (GIB) has been developed as an effective retrofitting solution for soft-story buildings. This paper presents a cost-benefit study of a building retrofitted using the GIB system. A six-story, reinforced concrete (RC) frame with an open story at the ground level and masonry infills on all other floors is studied. To investigate the effectiveness of alternate retrofit configurations, different scenarios of GIB systems are numerically analyzed, expected repair costs for various levels of seismic intensity are computed, and cost benefit values are compared to each other and to those obtained when the building is strengthened and stiffened at the ground floor using conventional methods. Results show that GIB retrofit solutions are likely to represent significant cost benefits compared to traditional retrofit solutions. The results also indicate that GIBs do not need to be positioned at all column locations of the soft story, which could be beneficial in reducing the overall retrofit cost and improving architectural functionality of the retrofitted structure.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 879
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-benefit analysis of retrofitted non-engineered and engineered buildings in Nepal using probabilistic approach
    Dumaru, Rakesh
    Rodrigues, Hugo
    Varum, Humberto
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 122 : 1 - 15
  • [2] Lifecycle cost-benefit analysis of isolated buildings
    Goda, K.
    Lee, C. S.
    Hong, H. P.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2010, 32 (01) : 52 - 63
  • [3] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR SEISMIC REABILITATION OF BUILDINGS
    Salvado, Filipa
    Joao Falcao Silva, M.
    [J]. M2D2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN, 2015, : 1411 - 1412
  • [4] Cost-benefit analysis of water conservation systems installed in household buildings in Nairobi County
    Shikuku, James
    Munala, Gerryshom
    Njuguna, Mugwima
    Muhoro, Teckla
    Gremley, Andrew
    Nyakundi, Victor
    Ali, Muhammad
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (06) : 709 - 724
  • [5] Cost-benefit analysis of green buildings: An Israeli office buildings case study
    Gabay, Hadas
    Meir, Isaac A.
    Schwartz, Moshe
    Werzberger, Elia
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 76 : 558 - 564
  • [6] APPLICATION OF COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TO STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT OF ANCIENT BUILDINGS
    Falcao Silva, Maria Joao
    Salvado, Filipa
    Baiao, Manuel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN (M2D2017), 2017, : 1303 - 1304
  • [7] Cost-benefit analysis of environmental management systems
    Kern, S
    [J]. PAPIER, 1999, 53 (03): : 152 - 153
  • [8] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF URBAN INFORMATION SYSTEMS
    LEYLAND, G
    [J]. EKISTICS, 1970, 30 (176): : 77 - 80
  • [9] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Crash Cushion Systems
    Schrum, Kevin D.
    De Albuquerque, Francisco D. B.
    Sicking, Dean L.
    Lechtenberg, Karla A.
    Faller, Ronald K.
    Reid, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2015, 7 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [10] Attacking recommender systems: A cost-benefit analysis
    Hurley, Neil J.
    O'Mahony, Michael P.
    Silvestre, Guenole C. M.
    [J]. IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (03) : 64 - 68