Antimicrobial activity and in vitro susceptibility test development for cefditoren against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus species

被引:29
|
作者
Johnson, DM [1 ]
Biedenbach, DJ [1 ]
Beach, ML [1 ]
Pfaller, MA [1 ]
Jones, RN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Div Med Microbiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00136-X
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Cefditoren, a third generation orally administered aminothiazolyl cephalosporin, has demonstrated bactericidal activity against many Gram positive and negative bacterial pathogens and stability against clinically important B-lactamases. Cefditoren was compared to cefaclor, cefixime, and penicillins against 1435 recently isolated strains of streptococci (312 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 165 viridans group streptococci, 142 beta-haemolytic streptococci), Haemophilus influenzae (521 strains), and Moraxella catarrhalis (295 strains). Streptococcus pneumoniae and viridans group streptococci had penicillin nonsusceptible rates of 37.8 and 35.8, respectively. cefditoren (MIC90 in mu g/ml% susceptible) activity against all tested H. influenzae (0.03/100) and M. catarrhalis (0.06-0.5/100) was comparable to cefixime and significantly greater than cefaclor. Cefditoren (MIC90, 0.5 mu g/ml) was 4- to 128- fold more active than comparison beta-lactams against the pneumoococci and was the most potent beta-lactam (including penicillin) versus beta-haemolytic streptococci, Cefditoren pharmacokinetics demonstrate a T-1/2 of 1.5-2h and C-max values of 2.8 and 4.6 mu g/ml, respectively with 200 or 400 mg doses of cefditoren pivoxil; plasma concentrations exceed 1 mu g/ml for 4 to 6 hours (33-50% of dosing interval). Consequently, a susceptible MIC of less than or equal to 1 mu g/ml or less than or equal to 2 mu g/ml was proposed with zone dimeter correlates of greater than or equal to 18 and greater than or equal to 15 mm (5-mu g disk) for all cited fastidious species tested. Categorical agreement between MIC and disk tests was 95.6 to 100% with a correlation coefficient (r) range of 0.50 to 0.90 for streptococci. H. influenzae intermethod comparison results using the same interpretive criteria were in complete agreement, but exhibited a low r = 0.39. Cefditoren clearly possesses the most potent activity among currently studied oral cephalosporins or penicillin against commonly isolated bacterial pathogens causing bronchitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, or pharyngitis and was active against nearly all penicilllin-resisitant streptococci at less than or equal to 0.5 mu g/ml. Expanded clinical investigations seem warranted. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 105
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Benchmarking the in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against recent isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae.: A European multi-centre study
    Jones, ME
    Staples, AM
    Critchley, I
    Thornsberry, C
    Heinze, P
    Engler, HD
    Sahm, DF
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2000, 37 (03) : 203 - 211
  • [42] In vitro activity of cefditoren and other antimicrobial agents against 288 Streptococcus pneumoniae and 220 Haemophilus influenzae clinical strains isolated in Zaragoza, Spain
    Seral, Cristina
    Suarez, Laura
    Rubio-Calvo, Carmen
    Gomez-Lus, Rafael
    Gimeno, Mercedes
    Coronel, Pilar
    Duran, Estrella
    Becerril, Raquel
    Oca, Mercedes
    Castillo, F. Javier
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2008, 62 (02) : 210 - 215
  • [43] The Italian Epidemiological Survey 1997-1999 -: Antimicrobial susceptibility data of Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in Italy
    Nicoletti, G
    Blandino, G
    Caccamo, F
    Friscia, O
    Schito, AM
    Speciale, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2002, 20 (04) : 263 - 269
  • [44] Antimicrobial activity of cefditoren tested against contemporary (2004-2006) isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections in the United States
    Biedenbach, Douglas J.
    Jones, Ronald N.
    Fritsche, Thomas R.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2008, 61 (02) : 240 - 244
  • [45] Vaccine development for nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis:: progress and challenges
    Murphy, Timothy F.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2005, 4 (06) : 843 - 853
  • [46] Mutant prevention concentration of four quinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis
    Nakai, Hajime
    Sato, Takumi
    Uno, Takashi
    Furukawa, Emiko
    Kawamura, Masato
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Watanabe, Akira
    Fujimura, Shigeru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2017, 50 : S82 - S82
  • [47] In vitro activity of the novel ketolide HMR 3647 and comparative oral antibiotics against Canadian respiratory tract isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis
    Hoban, DJ
    Zhanel, GG
    Karlowsky, JA
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1999, 35 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [48] Activities of faropenem, an oral β-lactam, against recent US isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis
    Critchley, IA
    Karlowsky, JA
    Draghi, DC
    Jones, ME
    Thornsberry, C
    Murfitt, K
    Sahm, DF
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (02) : 550 - 555
  • [49] Survey of susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis isolates to 26 antimicrobial agents:: a prospective US study
    Thornsberry, C
    Ogilvie, PT
    Holley, HP
    Sahm, DF
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 (11) : 2612 - 2623
  • [50] Species-independent pharmacodynamics of gemifloxacin and ciprofloxacin with Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in an in vitro dynamic model
    Portnoy, YA
    Vostrov, SN
    Lubenko, IY
    Zinner, SH
    Firsov, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2002, 20 (03) : 201 - 205