An investigation on the environmental impacts and energy efficiency of biogas and bioethanol production from sugarcane and sugar beet molasses: A case study

被引:2
|
作者
Zaki Dizaji, Hassan [1 ]
Haroni, Sepideh [1 ]
Sheikhdavoodi, Mohammad Javad [1 ]
Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad [1 ]
Gonzalez Alriols, Maria [2 ]
Kiani, Mostafa Kiani Deh [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Chamran Univ Ahvaz, Fac Agr, Biosyst Engn Dept, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Gipuzkoa Engn Sch, Chem & Environm Engn Dept, Leioa, Spain
关键词
Environmental impacts; LCA; net energy ratio; net energy value; sensibility analysis;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2021.1898493
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study presents a comparison in terms of both environmental effect/energy efficiency of different designs of the process for sugarcane/sugar beet molasses-based bioethanol. In the present work, two scenarios were designed/compared, including the production of sugarcane-based (Scenario 1) and sugar beet molasses bioethanol (Scenario 2) in Khuzestan Province as an agricultural hub of Iran. Furthermore, an improved process, including a biogas production line from the residual vinasse from the distillation of molasses for bioethanol obtaining is presented, both from sugarcane (scenario 3) and sugar beet (scenario 4), and life cycle assessment (LCA) method was employed for determination of environmental impacts. The results, in terms of net energy value (NEV), i.e. the difference between the energy content of ethanol and the energy used in its production and distribution, were very similar as 11.03 MJ and 11.15 MJ, respectively. Nevertheless, the results of the environmental impact analysis indicated that bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses had a higher impact compared to the sugar beet in terms of global warming potential, fossil, and metal depletion, particulate matter formation, human toxicity, and climate change ecosystems. Furthermore, the addition of the biogas production plant from the residual vinasse (scenarios 3 and 4) resulted in a considerable reduction of all studied environmental impacts (i.e., climate change, human toxicity, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidant formation, terrestrial acidification, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, ionizing radiation, fossil depletion, and global warming). As an example, by applying scenarios 3 and 4, the global warming potential for sugarcane and sugar beet was reduced by 61.2% and 83%, and the climate change decreased by 61% and 81% for bioethanol production from sugarcane and sugar beet, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determination of energy balance of sugar beet production in Turkey: a case study of KA±rklareli Province
    Baran, Mehmet Firat
    Gokdogan, Osman
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2016, 9 (02) : 487 - 494
  • [42] Environmental impact and energy balance assessment in ethanol production from sugarcane molasses: A life cycle analysis in southern India
    Uppalapati, Sudhakar
    Jani, S. P.
    Raj, J. Bensam
    Rajaganapathy, C.
    Murugapoopathi, S.
    Shangdiar, Sumarlin
    Amesho, Kassian T. T.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 204
  • [43] POTENTIAL OF BIOGAS PRODUCTION FROM ANIMAL MANURE AND BIOGAS ENERGY OPPORTUNITY: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY
    Tinmaz-Kose, Esra
    Gormus, Cemre
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2018, 27 (12): : 8509 - 8518
  • [44] Optimised biogas production from the co-digestion of sugar beet with pig slurry: Integrating energy, GHG and economic accounting
    Boldrin, Alessio
    Baral, Khagendra Raj
    Fitamo, Temesgen
    Vazifehkhoran, Ali Heidarzadeh
    Jensen, Ida Graested
    Kjaergaard, Ida
    Lyng, Kari-Anne
    Nguyen, Quan Van
    Nielsen, Lise Skovsgaard
    Triolo, Jin Mi
    [J]. ENERGY, 2016, 112 : 606 - 617
  • [45] Analysis of 3E (Energy-Economical-Environmental) for Biogas Production from Landfill: A Case Study
    Alayi, Reza
    Sadeghzadeh, Milad
    Shahbazi, Mohsen
    Seyednouri, Seyed Reza
    Issakhov, Alibek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [46] Energy balance and environmental impacts of rice and wheat production: A case study in Nepal
    Pokhrel, Anil
    Soni, Peeyush
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 12 (01) : 201 - 207
  • [47] GROSS ENERGY YIELDS AND SUPPORT ENERGY-REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCTION OF SUGAR FROM BEET AND CANE - STUDY OF 4 PRODUCTION AREAS
    AUSTIN, RB
    KINGSTON, G
    LONGDEN, PC
    DONOVAN, PA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1978, 91 (DEC): : 667 - 675
  • [48] Environmental Sustainability and Economic Benefits of Dairy Farm Biogas Energy Production: A Case Study in Umbria
    Torquati, Biancamaria
    Venanzi, Sonia
    Ciani, Adriano
    Diotallevi, Francesco
    Tamburi, Vincenzo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (10) : 6696 - 6713
  • [49] Can applying renewable energy for Australian sugarcane irrigation reduce energy cost and environmental impacts? A case study approach
    Powell, Janine W.
    Welsh, Jon M.
    Pannell, David
    Kingwell, Ross
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 240
  • [50] Life cycle energy efficiency and environmental impact assessment of bioethanol production from sweet potato based on different production modes
    Zhang, Jun
    Jia, Chunrong
    Wu, Yi
    Xia, Xunfeng
    Xi, Beidou
    Wang, Lijun
    Zhai, Youlong
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):