Multi-criteria decision making for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Aziza Fahmy Palace, Alexandria, Egypt

被引:38
|
作者
Haroun, Hebatu-Allah Abdul Fattah [1 ]
Bakr, Ali Fouad [1 ]
Hasan, Asmaa El-Sayed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Dept Architecture, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Heritage buildings; Multi-criteria decision making; Analytic hierarchy process; Re-use selection;
D O I
10.1016/j.aej.2019.04.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The process of selecting new uses for heritage buildings needs to consider a number of crucial criteria in order to determine and select the optimum option. The inappropriate selected use of a heritage building can lead to lose its value. This paper aims to introduce an appropriate evaluation tool to support the efficiency in selecting the optimum solution. The integrated multi criteria decision-making tools are used to support decision making in such cases (problems involving multiple criteria). Several MCDM tools have been developed for choosing the optimal probable options. Each tool has its own characteristics in finding the best alternatives. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, (AHP) that was developed by Professor Thomas Saaty in the late 1970s, was the most suitable tool for this study. The software selected and used in this work was Microsoft Excel. Aziza Fahmy Palace was selected as the case study in this paper. There are four suggested alternatives; which are: hotel, museum, office building and mixed uses. Using the application of AHP, the result showed that the best use is mixed uses with the highest value, which is 0.30 (30%), followed in sequential order by museum, office building and hotel. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 478
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Extraction of Prerequisite Criteria for Environmentally Certified Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings
    Farjami, Elnaz
    Turker, Ozlem Olgac
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [22] Selecting design strategies using multi-criteria decision making to improve the sustainability of buildings
    Invidiata, Andrea
    Lavagna, Monica
    Ghisi, Enedir
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 139 : 58 - 68
  • [23] Multi-criteria decision-making for seismic resilience and sustainability assessment of diagrid buildings
    Asadi, Esmaeel
    Salman, Abdullahi M.
    Li, Yue
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 191 : 229 - 246
  • [24] An original multi-criteria decision-making algorithm for solar panels selection in buildings
    El-Bayeh, Claude Ziad
    Alzaareer, Khaled
    Brahmi, Brahim
    Zellagui, Mohamed
    Eicker, Ursula
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 217
  • [25] Seismic retrofitting of strategic buildings based on multi-criteria decision-making analysis
    Vona, M.
    Murgante, B.
    [J]. LIFE-CYCLE OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS: DESIGN, ASSESSMENT, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 1846 - 1851
  • [26] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [27] Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Skyline Computation
    Choi, Wonik
    Liu, Ling
    Yu, Boseon
    [J]. 2012 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION (IRI), 2012, : 316 - 323
  • [28] SYSTEMATIC DECISION MAKING: A EXTENDED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL
    Yu, Xiaohan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Hu, Junquan
    Liu, Shousheng
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2017, 23 (01) : 157 - 177
  • [29] Semantic Multi-Criteria Decision Making SeMCDM
    Mahmoudi, Ghadi
    Mueller-Schloer, Christian
    [J]. MCDM: 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, 2009, : 149 - 156
  • [30] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141