Impact of Telephone Follow-Up on Patient Satisfaction in a Pediatric Neurosurgery Clinic

被引:2
|
作者
Blanco, Erica [1 ]
Samuels, Shenae [2 ]
Kimball, Rebekah [3 ]
Patel, Daxa [4 ]
Citty, Sandra [1 ]
Spader, Heather [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Nursing, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Mem Healthcare Syst, Off Human Res, Hollywood, FL USA
[3] Florida Atlantic Univ, Coll Med, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[4] Joe DiMaggio Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Neurosci, 1150 N 35th Ave,Suite 520, Hollywood, FL 33021 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE | 2020年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
patient satisfaction; telephone follow-up; clinic visit; pediatrics; quality improvement; CARE; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/2374373520919210
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Patient satisfaction is a key metric used to measure quality in health care. However, patient satisfaction measures in the pediatric population are less studied and understood than in the adult population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of telephone follow-up on patient satisfaction in an outpatient pediatric neurosurgery clinic. A standardized telephone follow-up call was performed within 1 week of a child's clinic visit. Pearson's chi(2) or Fisher's exact tests were used to assess changes in patient satisfaction measures after implementation of the telephone follow-up call initiative. The proportion of overall "top-box" physician rating significantly increased from 85.5% in 2017 to 95.6% in 2018 (P = .04). There was also a nonsignificant upward trend in the proportion of respondents noting that they would recommend this provider, as well as in all measures of physician communication quality and office staff quality. A simple telephone call to new patients after an outpatient pediatric neurosurgery clinic visit resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful changes in patient satisfaction scores.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1259
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implementation of an ICU follow-up clinic: outcomes and patient satisfaction after 1 year
    G De la Cerda
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [32] Factors affecting patient satisfaction with follow-up by a nurse practitioner in an outpatient rheumatology clinic
    Wooten, MD
    Johnson, RD
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2000, 6 (04) : 184 - 188
  • [33] Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone consultation for the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer
    Shaida, N.
    Jones, C.
    Ravindranath, N.
    Das, T.
    Wilmott, K.
    Jones, A.
    Malone, P. R.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2007, 10 (04) : 369 - 373
  • [34] Telephone follow-up on treatment and patient satisfaction at a Danish tertiary headache center: A prospective study
    Carlsen, Louise Ninett
    Bendtsen, Lars
    Jensen, Rigmor Hojland
    Schytz, Henrik Winther
    HEADACHE, 2022, 62 (10): : 1312 - 1321
  • [35] Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone consultation for the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer
    N Shaida
    C Jones
    N Ravindranath
    T Das
    K Wilmott
    A Jones
    P R Malone
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2007, 10 : 369 - 373
  • [36] FOLLOW-UP BY TELEPHONE
    RAO, JN
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6968): : 1527 - 1528
  • [37] Patient satisfaction with telephone memory clinic
    Khaing, Myitzu
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2021, 40 : 35 - 35
  • [38] Patient satisfaction with specialist ICU follow-up
    Hames, KC
    Gager, M
    Waldmann, CS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (02) : 372P - 373P
  • [39] Compliance with treatment and follow-up in a pediatric obesity clinic
    Turan, Serap
    Guran, Tulay
    Akcay, Teoman
    Ay, Pinar
    Tekin, Ayse
    Alkan, Esra
    Yegen, Serkan Fatih
    Serenli, Zafer
    Bereket, Abdullah
    HORMONE RESEARCH, 2006, 65 : 86 - 86
  • [40] The success of data collection in the palliative setting—telephone or clinic follow-up?
    Peiman Haddad
    Paula Wilson
    Rebecca Wong
    Diane Williams
    Neena Sharma
    Freidele Soban
    Michael McLean
    Wilfred Levin
    Andrea Bezjak
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2003, 11 : 555 - 559