Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales

被引:27
|
作者
Park, Minjeong [1 ]
Wu, Amery D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
item response tree model; Likert-type rating scales; extreme response style; acquiescence; disacquiescence; MULTIPROCESS IRT MODELS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0013164419829855
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Item response tree (IRTree) models are recently introduced as an approach to modeling response data from Likert-type rating scales. IRTree models are particularly useful to capture a variety of individuals' behaviors involving in item responding. This study employed IRTree models to investigate response styles, which are individuals' tendencies to prefer or avoid certain response categories in a rating scale. Specifically, we introduced two types of IRTree models, descriptive and explanatory models, perceived under a larger modeling framework, called explanatory item response models, proposed by De Boeck and Wilson. This extends the typical application of IRTree models for studying response styles. As a demonstration, we applied the descriptive and explanatory IRTree models to examine acquiescence and extreme response styles in Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Our findings suggested the presence of two distinct extreme response styles and acquiescence response style in the scale.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 930
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modified Logistic Regression Approaches to Eliminating the Impact of Response Styles on Differential Item Functioning Detection in Likert-Type Scale (vol 8, 1143, 2017)
    Chen, Hui-Fang
    Jin, Kuan-Yu
    Wang, Wen-Chung
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [22] THE EFFECTS OF HALO AND LENIENCY ON COOPERATING TEACHER REPORTS USING LIKERT-TYPE RATING-SCALES
    PHELPS, L
    SCHMITZ, CD
    BOATRIGHT, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 79 (03): : 151 - 154
  • [23] How many response categories are sufficient for Likert type scales? An empirical study based on the Item Response Theory
    Aybek, Eren Can
    Toraman, Cetin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 9 (02): : 534 - 547
  • [24] Effects of Response Option Order on Likert-Type Psychometric Properties and Reactions
    Robie, Chet
    Meade, Adam W.
    Risavy, Stephen D.
    Rasheed, Sabah
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2022, 82 (06) : 1107 - 1129
  • [25] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NUMBER OF RESPONSE CATEGORIES AND RELIABILITY OF LIKERT-TYPE QUESTIONNAIRES
    MASTERS, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1974, 11 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [26] Score reliability in Web- or Internet-based surveys: Unnumbered graphic rating scales versus likert-type scales
    Cook, C
    Heath, F
    Thompson, RL
    Thompson, B
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 61 (04) : 697 - 706
  • [27] COMPARING EXTREME RESPONSE STYLES BETWEEN AGREE-DISAGREE AND ITEM-SPECIFIC SCALES
    Liu, Mingnan
    Lee, Sunghee
    Conrad, Frederick G.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2015, 79 (04) : 952 - 975
  • [28] What's in a Likert response? Psychometric models for measuring traits and response styles
    Meiser, Thorsten
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 91 - 91
  • [29] Killing Two Birds with One Stone: Accounting for Unfolding Item Response Process and Response Styles Using Unfolding Item Response Tree Models
    Li, Zhaojun
    Li, Lingyue
    Zhang, Bo
    Cao, Mengyang
    Tay, Louis
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [30] Faking Detection Improved: Adopting a Likert Item Response Process Tree Model
    Sun, Tianjun
    Zhang, Bo
    Cao, Mengyang
    Drasgow, Fritz
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2022, 25 (03) : 490 - 512