The effects of gilsonite and crumb rubber on moisture damage resistance of stone matrix asphalt mixtures

被引:23
|
作者
Ameli, Alireza [1 ]
Pakshir, Amir Hossein [2 ]
Babagoli, Rezvan [3 ]
Habibpour, Ali [4 ]
Norouzi, Navid [4 ]
Davoudinezhad, Siamak [5 ]
机构
[1] Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Malard Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Lenjan Branch, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Univ Sci & Technol Mazandaran, Dept Civil Engn, Behshahr, Mazandaran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Sci & Technol IUST, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[5] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Arak Branch, Arak, Iran
关键词
Moisture resistance; Gilsonite; Crumb rubber; Stone matrix asphalt; Asphalt mixture;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122052
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The current study was performed to investigate the influence of gilsonite on properties of binder and moisture resistance of SMA mixtures modified by Crumb Rubber (CR) additive. For this purpose, softening point, penetration, and Dynamic Shear Rheometer tests were implemented to investigate the performance of different binders. To evaluate the water sensitivity of modified mixtures, four different methods were performed, including Resilient Modulus Ratio (RMR), Fracture Energy Ratio (FER), Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) and Texas boiling. To analyze the data, two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out. Based on the results, utilization of Gilsonite additive enhances the Resilient Modulus (Mr), Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS), and Fracture Energy (FE) of asphalt mixtures. The results also revealed that by utilization of CR, ITS and FE values increase. While, the MR values increase by addition of 10% CR, and by addition of higher percentages of CR (15 and 20%), the MR values decrease. Among different specimens fabricated, mixtures containing 30% Gilsonite and 20% CR have the highest ITS and FE values. Also, according to the results, 30% Gilsonite mixture modified by 20% CR has the highest TSR, and FER value, which indicates that the mentioned specimens have better resistance to water susceptibility. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of in uencing factors on rutting resistance of stone matrix asphalt mixtures
    Guo R.
    Scientia Iranica, 2020, 27 (3 A) : 1039 - 1049
  • [42] Analysis of influencing factors on rutting resistance of stone matrix asphalt mixtures
    Guo, R.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2020, 27 (03) : 1039 - 1049
  • [43] An Overview of Moisture Damage in Asphalt Mixtures
    Hamzah, Meor Othman
    Kakar, Muhammad Rafiq
    Hainin, Mohd Rosli
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 73 (04):
  • [44] Assessment of crumb rubber Stone Mastic asphalt potential to be used in Angola
    Chissama, Kapila S.S.
    Picado-Santos, Luis G.
    Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2021, 15
  • [45] Assessment of crumb rubber Stone Mastic asphalt potential to be used in Angola
    Chissama, Kapila S. S.
    Picado-Santos, Luis G.
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2021, 15
  • [46] Effects of various additives on the moisture damage sensitivity of asphalt mixtures
    Aksoy, A
    Samlioglu, K
    Tayfur, S
    Özen, H
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2005, 19 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [47] Evaluation of moisture sensitivity of stone matrix asphalt mixtures using polymerised warm mix asphalt technologies
    Shivaprasad, Punith V.
    Xiao, Feipeng
    Amirkhanian, Serji N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2012, 13 (02) : 152 - 165
  • [48] Effect of moisture damage on material properties and fatigue resistance of asphalt mixtures
    Kim, YR
    Little, DN
    Lytton, RL
    BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES 2004, 2004, (1891): : 48 - 54
  • [49] Differences in cracking resistance of asphalt mixtures due to ageing and moisture damage
    Lopez-Montero, Teresa
    Miro, Rodrigo
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 112 : 299 - 306
  • [50] Performance evaluation of crumb rubber and paraffin modified stone mastic asphalt
    Kok, Baha Vural
    Yilmaz, Mehmet
    Akpolat, Mustafa
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 43 (05) : 402 - 410