Failure Rate Prediction Model of Substation Equipment Based on Weibull Distribution and Time Series Analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Wang, Jingjing [1 ]
Yin, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2019年 / 7卷
关键词
Equipment failure; predictive models; Weibull distribution; time series analysis; RELIABILITY; LIFE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926159
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The failure rate is an important indicator to assess the reliability of substation equipment, and the failure rate prediction is an effective way to master the operation status of substation equipment. According to the characteristics of failure rate data, such as failure period segmentation and stochastic variation, this paper proposes a combined prediction method by the data decomposition of failure rate time series and the segmentation theory of failure periods and then establishes a new failure rate prediction model of the substation equipment based on the Weibull distribution and time series analysis. Compared with the traditional Weibull distribution function model which cannot describe the stochastic variation of failure rate data and cannot identify the failure period automatically, the proposed model in this paper uses the minimum sum algorithm of residual squares obtained by the Weibull distribution to accurately identify the demarcation point between different failure periods and then establishes the autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model to achieve combined prediction. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed model is verified by the engineering example and comparison with the traditional failure rate prediction methods.
引用
收藏
页码:85298 / 85309
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A reliability prediction model for missile systems based on truncated Weibull distribution
    Hwang, HS
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 31 (1-2) : 245 - 248
  • [42] Prediction of the Failure Stress of Hydrogen-rich Water Based Cement Mortar Using the Weibull Distribution Model
    Jo, Byung Wan
    Chakraborty, Sumit
    Sikandar, Muhammad Ali
    Lee, Yun Sung
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (05) : 1827 - 1839
  • [43] A Study on Prediction Model of Equipment Failure Through Analysis of Big Data Based on RHadoop
    Ku, Jin-Hee
    WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 98 (04) : 3163 - 3176
  • [44] A Study on Prediction Model of Equipment Failure Through Analysis of Big Data Based on RHadoop
    Jin-Hee Ku
    Wireless Personal Communications, 2018, 98 : 3163 - 3176
  • [45] A Hybrid Model Based on Singular Spectrum Analysis and Support Vector Machines Regression for Failure Time Series Prediction
    Wang, Xin
    Wu, Ji
    Liu, Chao
    Wang, Senzhang
    Niu, Wensheng
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 32 (08) : 2717 - 2738
  • [46] Wireless Spectrum Prediction Model Based on Time Series Analysis Method
    Su, Jinzhao
    Wu, Wei
    2009 ACM WORKSHOP ON COGNITIVE RADIO NETWORKS-CORONET 09, 2009, : 61 - 66
  • [47] Power customer complaint prediction model based on time series analysis
    Guo S.
    Tang L.
    Guo X.
    Huang Z.
    Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 2020, 34 (04) : 471 - 477
  • [48] Calculation Method of Outage Probability of Distribution Network Based on Real-Time Failure Rate of Equipment
    Fang, Jian
    Lin, Xiang
    Wang, Hongbin
    Yin, Kuang
    Zhang, Min
    Fang, Min
    Li, Shengnan
    2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS (ICPES), 2019,
  • [49] COMPARISON OF STRATIFIED WEIBULL MODEL AND WEIBULL ACCELERATED FAILURE TIME (AFT) MODEL IN THE ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL CANCER SURVIVAL
    Juhan, Nurliyana
    Razak, Nuradhiathy Abd
    Zubairi, Yong Zulina
    Naing, Nyi Nyi
    Hussin, Che Haziqah Che
    Daud, Muhamad Azlan
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2016, 78 (6-4): : 21 - 26
  • [50] Distribution Transformer Failure Rate Prediction Model Based on Multi-Source Information
    Niu, Jincang
    Su, Jianjun
    Yang, Yi
    Cai, Yanan
    Liu, Hang
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONDITION MONITORING AND DIAGNOSIS (CMD), 2016, : 944 - 947