EVALUATING THRESHOLD RADIAL AND ADAPTIVE FILL SECONDARY SAMPLING METHODS FOR CONTAMINATED SOIL SAMPLING EFFICIENCY

被引:0
|
作者
Zawadzki, Jaroslaw [1 ]
Targowski, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Dept Environm Engn, PL-00661 Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
geostatistics; heavy metals; soils; ecological risk; secondary sampling designs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The purpose of the work was to compare effectiveness of common secondary sampling methods for assessing the distribution of soil pollution. The study case is based on an example of assessing the spatial distribution of soil contamination with lead in Slawkow area (Upper Silesian Industrial Region). This comparison was made in regard to both precision of the spatial estimation and minimization the cost of measuring campaign. The special attention was given to the often applied secondary sampling designs such as threshold radial (also known as adaptive cluster sampling) and adaptive fill sampling. These two methods were tested in typical municipal and suburban environment in Slawkow area. The work contains also detailed statistical and geostatistical analysis of the above-mentioned contamination, and elaboration of series of its spatial distributions using numerous alternative sampling designs. The determined sampling plans make it possible to find compromise between ecological and financial aspects. A combination of the obtained results with the legal regulations in force concerning concentrations of heavy metals in soils are the basis for reliably estimation the ecological hazard arising from the soil contamination with lead in the Slawkow area. The results of performed analyses show that better efficiency in terms of cost and precision of measuring campaign gives rather coarser preliminary sampling design followed by appropriate secondary sampling then use the one-stage very dense measuring grid.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] SAMPLING OF CONTAMINATED SOIL - SAMPLING ERROR IN RELATION TO SAMPLE-SIZE AND SEGREGATION
    LAME, FPJ
    DEFIZE, PR
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (10) : 2035 - 2044
  • [12] ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF EVALUATING SAMPLING PLANS
    DIETRICH, DL
    ZONNENSHAIN, A
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 1983, 16 (02) : 33 - 33
  • [13] EVALUATING THE PRODUCTS OF ALTERNATIVE SAMPLING METHODS
    SMITH, AW
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1989, 21 (02) : 175 - 191
  • [14] Computational methods for evaluating clone sampling efficiency in normalized cDNA libraries.
    Hoh, J
    Gordon, D
    Lints, T
    Matise, TC
    Ott, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 65 (04) : A227 - A227
  • [15] Analysis of procedures for sampling contaminated soil using Gy's Sampling Theory and Practice
    Boudreault, Jean-Philippe
    Dube, Jean-Sebastien
    Sona, Mirela
    Hardy, Eric
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 425 : 199 - 207
  • [16] Efficiency and effectiveness of statistical sampling methods
    Mandl, G
    Jung, M
    BETRIEBSWIRTSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 1997, 49 (03): : 229 - 244
  • [17] AUV Adaptive Sampling Methods: A Review
    Hwang, Jimin
    Bose, Neil
    Fan, Shuangshuang
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (15):
  • [18] Evaluating aerosol transmission efficiency in a sampling system
    Liu, De-Ling
    Journal of the IEST, 2013, 56 (02): : 29 - 42
  • [19] METHODS FOR SAMPLING ROOTS FROM A SOIL
    KHARITON.YP
    SOVIET SOIL SCIENCE-USSR, 1965, (03): : 302 - &
  • [20] Evaluating an adaptive sampling algorithm to assist soil survey in New South Wales, Australia
    Huang, Jingyi
    McBratney, Alex B.
    Minasny, Budiman
    Malone, Brendan
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2020, 21