EVALUATING THRESHOLD RADIAL AND ADAPTIVE FILL SECONDARY SAMPLING METHODS FOR CONTAMINATED SOIL SAMPLING EFFICIENCY

被引:0
|
作者
Zawadzki, Jaroslaw [1 ]
Targowski, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Dept Environm Engn, PL-00661 Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
geostatistics; heavy metals; soils; ecological risk; secondary sampling designs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The purpose of the work was to compare effectiveness of common secondary sampling methods for assessing the distribution of soil pollution. The study case is based on an example of assessing the spatial distribution of soil contamination with lead in Slawkow area (Upper Silesian Industrial Region). This comparison was made in regard to both precision of the spatial estimation and minimization the cost of measuring campaign. The special attention was given to the often applied secondary sampling designs such as threshold radial (also known as adaptive cluster sampling) and adaptive fill sampling. These two methods were tested in typical municipal and suburban environment in Slawkow area. The work contains also detailed statistical and geostatistical analysis of the above-mentioned contamination, and elaboration of series of its spatial distributions using numerous alternative sampling designs. The determined sampling plans make it possible to find compromise between ecological and financial aspects. A combination of the obtained results with the legal regulations in force concerning concentrations of heavy metals in soils are the basis for reliably estimation the ecological hazard arising from the soil contamination with lead in the Slawkow area. The results of performed analyses show that better efficiency in terms of cost and precision of measuring campaign gives rather coarser preliminary sampling design followed by appropriate secondary sampling then use the one-stage very dense measuring grid.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptive spatial sampling of contaminated soil
    Cox, LA
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (06) : 1059 - 1069
  • [2] EVALUATION OF EFFICIENCY SELECTED SECONDARY SAMPLING METHODS IN SOIL STUDIES
    Zawadzki, Jaroslaw
    Targowski, Adam
    ECOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY AND ENGINEERING A-CHEMIA I INZYNIERIA EKOLOGICZNA A, 2011, 18 (02): : 301 - 313
  • [3] Evaluating the efficiency of sampling methods in assessing soil macrofauna communities in arable systems
    Smith, Joanne
    Potts, Simon
    Eggleton, Paul
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2008, 44 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [4] Adaptive threshold sampling
    Ting, Daniel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF DATA (SIGMOD '22), 2022, : 1612 - 1625
  • [5] ON INCREASING SAMPLING EFFICIENCY BY ADAPTIVE SAMPLING
    CISCATO, D
    MARIANI, L
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1967, AC12 (03) : 318 - +
  • [6] Evaluating cokriging for improving soil nutrient sampling efficiency
    Han, Shufeng
    Schneider, Sally M.
    Evans, Robert G.
    Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2003, 46 (03): : 845 - 849
  • [7] Evaluating cokriging for improving soil nutrient sampling efficiency
    Han, S
    Schneider, SM
    Evans, RG
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2003, 46 (03): : 845 - 849
  • [8] Sampling of contaminated bulk soil masses - sampling model
    Neesse, Th.
    Dueck, J.
    Breiter, R.
    Aufbereitungs-Technik, 1997, 38 (12): : 653 - 659
  • [9] Efficiency and quality of soil sampling according to a sampling tool
    Nicoletti, Joao V. M.
    Franchi, Marcello R. A.
    Motomiya, Anamari V. de A.
    Motomiya, Wagner R.
    Molin, Jose P.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2023, 27 (06): : 480 - 486
  • [10] Sampling model for contaminated bulk soil masses
    Neesse, T
    Duck, J
    Breiter, R
    FIELD SCREENING EUROPE, 1997, : 43 - 46