What is governance in global telecoupling?

被引:16
|
作者
Newig, Jens [1 ]
Lenschow, Andrea [2 ]
Challies, Edward [3 ]
Cotta, Benedetta [1 ]
Schilling-Vacaflor, Almut [2 ]
机构
[1] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Res Grp Governance & Sustainabil, Luneburg, Germany
[2] Osnabruck Univ, Jean Monnet Chair European Integrat, Osnabruck, Germany
[3] Univ Canterbury, Waterways Ctr Freshwater Management, Christchurch, New Zealand
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2019年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
global commodity chains; global environmental governance; inter-regional connectedness; sustainability governance; EXPANSION; SYSTEMS; STOCK; FOOD;
D O I
10.5751/ES-11178-240326
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The concept of telecoupling is increasingly used as a framework to understand globally distant interconnections and their sustainability implications. Although there is a growing research focus on issues of governance related to global telecoupling, there appears little consensus over the meaning of "governance" in this respect. Papers in the recent Ecology and Society special feature titled "Telecoupling: A New Frontier for Global Sustainability" reveal quite different understandings of the telecoupling-governance relationship. We want to suggest that greater clarity and a common understanding of how governance figures in telecoupled systems will aid constructive dialogue on how to govern telecoupling toward more sustainable pathways in the face of pressing global social and environmental issues. This response, though not aiming to define a single, definitive framework of governance as it pertains to telecoupling, seeks to identify three distinct perspectives applied to governance in the context of global telecoupling: (1) governance by states or other actors that induces or fosters telecoupling in the first place, often irrespective of its sustainability implications; (2) governance mainly by private companies that coordinates telecoupled flows; and (3) governance by states, nonstate actors, and hybrid or multistakeholder initiatives that aims to address the negative externalities of telecoupling. By distinguishing these perspectives, we aim to make underlying understandings of governance explicit, and to foster further constructive exchange on the topic.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Global Governance
    Sarquis, Alessandra
    POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2014, 12 (01) : 108 - 108
  • [42] What Is Governance?
    Fukuyama, Francis
    GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2013, 26 (03): : 347 - 368
  • [43] Global trends and global governance
    Mathur, K
    DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2004, 35 (05) : 1100 - 1101
  • [44] Global governance and global politics
    Castells, M
    PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2005, 38 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [45] What Does It Mean to Take an Ethics+ Approach to Global Biobank Governance?
    Laurie G.
    Asian Bioethics Review, 2017, 9 (4) : 285 - 300
  • [46] The future of global governance after the pandemic crisis: what challenges will the BRICS face?
    Francesco Petrone
    International Politics, 2022, 59 : 244 - 259
  • [47] The future of global governance after the pandemic crisis: what challenges will the BRICS face?
    Petrone, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2022, 59 (02) : 244 - 259
  • [48] The Legal Strength of International Health Instruments - What It Brings to Global Health Governance?
    Nikogosian, Haik
    Kickbusch, Ilona
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 5 (12): : 683 - 685
  • [49] Telecoupling through tomato trade: what consumers do not know about the tomato on their plate
    Ibarrola-Rivas, Maria-Jose
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Kastner, Thomas
    Nonhebel, Sanderine
    Turkelboom, Francis
    GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3
  • [50] Integrating Modelling Approaches for Understanding Telecoupling: Global Food Trade and Local Land Use
    Millington, James D. A.
    Xiong, Hang
    Peterson, Steve
    Woods, Jeremy
    LAND, 2017, 6 (03)