Impact of forest co-management programs on forest conditions in Malawi

被引:13
|
作者
Chinangwa, Linda L. [1 ,2 ]
Pullin, Andrew S. [3 ]
Hockley, Neal [2 ]
机构
[1] United Nations Univ, Inst Adv Study Sustainabil, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Bangor Univ, Sch Environm Nat Resources & Geog, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[3] Bangor Univ, Sch Environm Nat Resources & Geog, Ctr Evidence Based Conservat, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
关键词
Biodiversity; co-management; conservation; forest reserves; sustainable use; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; LIVELIHOODS; RESOURCES; DECENTRALIZATION; INSTITUTIONS; PERCEPTION; COMMONS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1080/10549811.2017.1307764
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Forest co-management programs aim to conserve forest resources. However, there is little evidence of its effectiveness. We assess the impact of co-management approaches on forest conditions in Zomba-Malosa and Ntchisi forest reserves in Malawi using a multiple-site, plot-based, and control-intervention design. We used tree density and species richness as indicators of forest condition. Evidence of human activities was used as potential indicators of current and future impacts. Local peoples' perceptions of the impact of co-management on forest were also sought to validate the inventory information. Co-managed plots have higher tree density than state managed plots. Indicators of human activities including felled trees, farming and settlement plots, and grazing, were observed in both co-managed and state managed forest block. A majority of respondents, 84% in Zomba-Malosa and 73% in Ntchisi, perceive the co-management program to have a positive impact on forest conditions against a general worsening trend. Despite having a potential to improve forest conditions, the findings suggest that the outcomes of a co-management may vary depending on preexisting conditions and how communities understand and interpret the program. Hence, programs should not be implemented as a universal package. Furthermore, even with method triangulation, the lack of baseline data limited the quantification impacts; hence, integration of participatory research into the program is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 357
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance evaluation of forest co-management: a case study of Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh
    Umma Tamima
    [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, 27 : 853 - 861
  • [32] The John Prince Research Forest: Evolution of a co-management partnership in northern British Columbia
    Grainger, Sue
    Sherry, Erin
    Fondahl, Gail
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2006, 82 (04): : 484 - 495
  • [33] Performance evaluation of forest co-management: a case study of Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh
    Umma Tamima
    [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, 27 (04) : 853 - 861
  • [34] Potential for co-management approaches to strengthen livelihoods of forest dependent communities: A Kenyan case
    Ming'ate, Felix Lamech Mogambi
    Rennie, Hamish G.
    Memon, Ali
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 41 : 304 - 312
  • [35] What (De)Motivates Forest Users' Participation in Co-Management? Evidence from Nepal
    Kimengsi, Jude Ndzifon
    Bhusal, Prabin
    Aryal, Anisha
    Fernandez, Maria Vio Bianca Coronel
    Owusu, Raphael
    Chaudhary, Anand
    Nielsen, Wicki
    [J]. FORESTS, 2019, 10 (06):
  • [36] Performance evaluation of forest co-management: a case study of Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh
    Tamima, Umma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (04) : 853 - 861
  • [37] Can income programs reduce tropical forest pressure? Income shocks and forest use in Malawi
    Fisher, M
    Shively, G
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) : 1115 - 1128
  • [38] Analysis of Power in Fisheries Co-Management: Experiences from Malawi
    Njaya, Friday
    Donda, Steve
    Bene, Christophe
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 25 (07) : 652 - 666
  • [39] Does adoption of on-farm tree planting depend on Forest co-management? Evidence from selected Forest sites in Kenya
    Laichena, Joshua
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 128
  • [40] Co-management in Community Forestry: How the Partial Devolution of Management Rights Creates Challenges for Forest Communities
    Cronkleton, Peter
    Pulhin, Juan M.
    Saigal, Sushil
    [J]. CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2012, 10 (02): : 91 - 102