Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment

被引:3
|
作者
Ferreira, Pedro L. [1 ]
Luzeiro, Isabel [2 ]
Lopes, Margarida [3 ]
Jorge, Andre [4 ]
Silva, Bruno [4 ]
Ferreira, Lara [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Hlth Studies & Res, Ctr Innovat Biomed & Biotechnol, Fac Econ, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Coimbra Univ Hosp Ctr, Neurol Dept, Fac Med, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Braga Hosp, Neurol Dept, Braga, Portugal
[4] Coimbra Univ Hosp Ctr, Neurol Dept, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] Univ Algarve, Ctr Hlth Studies & Res, Ctr Innovat Biomed & Biotechnol, Univ Coimbra Sch Management Hospitality & Tourism, Faro, Portugal
关键词
Patient reported outcomes; Quality of life; Migraine; mMIDAS-P; Productivity; Disability; ASSESSMENT MIDAS QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSLATION; SAMPLE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient's sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and reliability of the portuguese version of the Pain Coping Inventory
    Oliveira, P.
    Me, Costa
    [J]. ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2012, 37 (02): : 126 - 133
  • [22] Reliability and validity of Portuguese version of the Pain Impact Questionnaire
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Gil, Joao N.
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Pacheco, Paula
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 123 - 123
  • [23] Reliability and Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale among Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Iranian Patients
    Zandifar, Alireza
    Asgari, Fatemeh
    Haghdoost, Faraidoon
    Masjedi, Samaneh Sadat
    Manouchehri, Navid
    Banihashemi, Mahboobeh
    Ghorbani, Abbas
    Najafi, Mohammad Reza
    Saadatnia, Mohammad
    Lipton, Richard B.
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [24] Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for the detection of delirium in the elderly
    Fabbri, RMA
    Moreira, MA
    Garrido, R
    Almeida, OP
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2001, 59 (2A) : 175 - 179
  • [25] Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the oswestry disability index - Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity
    Vigatto, Ricardo
    Costa Alexandre, Neusa Maria
    Correa Filho, Heleno Rodrigues
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (04) : 481 - 486
  • [26] The migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: translation, validation and reliability of Bahasa Melayu version
    Shaik, M. M.
    Hassan, N. B.
    Tan, H. L.
    Gan, S. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2014, 15
  • [27] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of Pain Disability Index
    Yamada, Keiko
    Mibu, Akira
    Kogo, Sonora
    Sullivan, Michael
    Nishigami, Tomohiko
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [28] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Facial Disability Index
    Ozden, Fatih
    Karaman, Ozgur Nadiye
    Tugay, Nazan
    Savas, Ozden
    Sozen, Tevfik
    Ucuncu, Harun
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (01) : 148 - 157
  • [29] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    [J]. ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [30] The psychiatric assessment schedule for adults with developmental disability checklist: reliability and validity of Turkish version
    Gormez, Aynur
    Kirpinar, Ismet
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 159 - 168