Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment

被引:3
|
作者
Ferreira, Pedro L. [1 ]
Luzeiro, Isabel [2 ]
Lopes, Margarida [3 ]
Jorge, Andre [4 ]
Silva, Bruno [4 ]
Ferreira, Lara [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Hlth Studies & Res, Ctr Innovat Biomed & Biotechnol, Fac Econ, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Coimbra Univ Hosp Ctr, Neurol Dept, Fac Med, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Braga Hosp, Neurol Dept, Braga, Portugal
[4] Coimbra Univ Hosp Ctr, Neurol Dept, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] Univ Algarve, Ctr Hlth Studies & Res, Ctr Innovat Biomed & Biotechnol, Univ Coimbra Sch Management Hospitality & Tourism, Faro, Portugal
关键词
Patient reported outcomes; Quality of life; Migraine; mMIDAS-P; Productivity; Disability; ASSESSMENT MIDAS QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSLATION; SAMPLE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-021-02085-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) is a useful tool to measure headache-related disability. Modified MIDAS with 4-week recall period reduces recall bias and improves accuracy of the results. This study aimed at validating mMIDAS in Portuguese. Methods Studied population consisted of adult migraine patients attending a headache outpatient clinic. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Content validity was evaluated by two expert panels. Construct validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor analysis. Criterion validity was tested using EQ-5D-5L and HADS. Results Ninety-two patients, 88% female, mean age of 44 years, participated. They had, in average, 9.7 headache days in previous month, pain averaging 7.5/10. About 69.9% were on a migraine prophylactic treatment, and 42.4% had severe disability; 29.4 and 13.0% showed, respectively, moderate/severe anxiety and depression. Content validity showed that mMIDAS-P is simple and clinically useful. It did not show to be determined by patient's sociodemographic characteristics and it was correlated with depression scale and EQ-5D-5L. Test-retest demonstrated high reproductive reliability and good internal consistency. Conclusion mMIDAS-P is valid and reliable. We strongly recommend it for clinical and research use.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the modified Migraine Disability Assessment
    Pedro L. Ferreira
    Isabel Luzeiro
    Margarida Lopes
    André Jorge
    Bruno Silva
    Lara Ferreira
    [J]. BMC Neurology, 21
  • [2] Validity and Reliability of the Bahasa Melayu Version of the Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire
    Shaik, Munvar Miya
    Hassan, Norul Badriah
    Tan, Huay Lin
    Bhaskar, Shalini
    Gan, Siew Hua
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [3] Reliability and Validity of Malaysian Language Translated Version of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire
    Shaik, M. M.
    Hassan, N. B.
    Tan, H. L.
    Bhaskar, S.
    Gan, H.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2013, 33 (11) : 970 - 971
  • [4] Validity and reliability of a modified version of the Neck Disability Index
    Ackelman, BH
    Lindgren, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2002, 34 (06) : 284 - 287
  • [5] The migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: reliability of the French version
    Lanteri-Minet, M
    Alchaar, H
    Besson, G
    Brudon, F
    Donnet, A
    Giraud, P
    Valance, J
    Bille-Turc, F
    Gaustaut, JL
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2003, 23 (07) : 750 - 750
  • [6] Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire
    Ertas, M
    Siva, A
    Dalkara, T
    Uzuner, N
    Dora, B
    Inan, L
    Idiman, F
    Sarica, Y
    Selçuki, D
    Sirin, H
    Oguzhanoglu, A
    Irkeç, C
    Özmenoglu, M
    Özbenli, T
    Öztürk, M
    Saip, S
    Neyal, M
    Zarifoglu, M
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2004, 44 (08): : 786 - 793
  • [7] Reliability and Validity of the Greek Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire
    Oikonomidi T.
    Vikelis M.
    Artemiadis A.
    Chrousos G.P.
    Darviri C.
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2018, 2 (1) : 77 - 85
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Japanese Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire
    Iigaya, M
    Sakai, F
    Kolodner, KB
    Lipton, RB
    Stewart, WF
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2003, 43 (04): : 343 - 352
  • [9] Validity and reliability of Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire in Turkish patients with migraine
    Gedikoglu, U
    Ücler, S
    Coskun, O
    Tunc, T
    Emre, U
    Yildiz, H
    Inan, L
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2003, 23 (07) : 757 - 757
  • [10] Validity, reliabillity and application of the Taiwan version of the migraine disability assessment questionnaire
    Hung, Pei-Hua
    Fuh, Jong-Ling
    Wang, Shuu-Jiun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 105 (07) : 563 - 568