Bayesian Value-at-Risk backtesting: The case of annuity pricing

被引:5
|
作者
Leung, Melvern [1 ]
Li, Youwei [2 ]
Pantelous, Athanasios A. [1 ]
Vigne, Samuel A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Dept Econometr & Business Stat, Wellington Rd,Clayton Campus, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Univ Hull, Hull Univ Business Sch, Cottingham Rd, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[3] Univ Dublin, Trinity Business Sch, Luce Hall,Pearse St, Dublin D02 H308, Ireland
关键词
Decision analysis; Value-at-Risk; Backtesting; Bayesian framework; Longevity risk;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.051
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We propose new Unconditional, Independence and Conditional Coverage VaR-forecast backtests for the case of annuity pricing under a Bayesian framework that significantly minimise the direct and indirect effects of p-hacking or other biased outcomes in decision-making, in general. As a consequence of the global financial crisis during 2007-09, regulatory demands arising from Solvency II has required a stricter assessment setting for the internal financial risk models of insurance companies. To put our newly proposed backtesting technique into practice we employ linear and nonlinear Bayesianised variants of two typically used mortality models in the context of annuity pricing. In this regard, we explore whether the stressed longevity scenarios are enough to capture the experienced liability over the forecasted time horizon. Most importantly, we conclude that our Bayesian decision theoretic framework quantitatively produce a strength of evidence favouring one decision over the other. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 801
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monte Carlo Methods for Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk: A Review
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Hu, Zhaolin
    Liu, Guangwu
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION, 2014, 24 (04):
  • [42] A SEQUENTIAL ELIMINATION APPROACH TO VALUE-AT-RISK AND CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK SELECTION
    Hepworth, Adam J.
    Atkinson, Michael P.
    Szechtman, Roberto
    [J]. 2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 2324 - 2335
  • [43] Analytical method for computing stressed value-at-risk with conditional value-at-risk
    Hong, KiHoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK, 2017, 19 (03): : 85 - 106
  • [44] A GENERAL FRAMEWORK OF IMPORTANCE SAMPLING FOR VALUE-AT-RISK AND CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK
    Sun, Lihua
    Hong, L. Jeff
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC 2009 ), VOL 1-4, 2009, : 415 - 422
  • [45] MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION OF VALUE-AT-RISK, CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK AND THEIR SENSITIVITIES
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Liu, Guangwu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2011, : 95 - 107
  • [46] Bayesian modeling and forecasting of Value-at-Risk via threshold realized volatility
    Chen, Cathy W. S.
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    [J]. APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, 2019, 35 (03) : 747 - 765
  • [47] The max–min newsvendor pricing problem under conditional value-at-risk criterion
    Wenyou Wang
    Yao Yang
    Sirong Luo
    [J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2024, 36 : 71 - 102
  • [48] Testing Conditional Asset Pricing in Pakistan: The Role of Value-at-risk and Illiquidity Factors
    Azher, Sara
    Iqbal, Javed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKET FINANCE, 2018, 17 : S259 - S281
  • [49] Volatility-sensitive Bayesian estimation ofportfolio value-at-risk and conditionalvalue-at-risk
    Bodnar, Taras
    Niklasson, Vilhelm
    Thorsen, Erik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK, 2024, 26 (04):
  • [50] Credible value-at-risk
    Mitic, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RISK, 2023, 18 (04): : 33 - 70