Comparison of the effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis

被引:6
|
作者
Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel [1 ]
Behcet, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Training & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Kilicarslan Mah 144,Sk 7-6 Merkez, Bolu, Turkey
[2] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Microbiol, Bolu, Turkey
关键词
Keratitis; Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-021-01696-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the early efficacy and safety of intrastromal injection of teicoplanin as the alternative treatment for the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis by comparing it with vancomycin. Materials and methods Twenty-four eyes of 24 New Zealand white rabbits were included in the study. MRSA keratitis was induced in the right eye of each rabbit by injecting 0.1 mL MRSA suspension containing 1000 colony-forming units (CFU) intrastromally to the central cornea. The rabbits were divided into three treatment groups 24 h after the inoculation of MRSA. Eight rabbits received intrastromal teicoplanin therapy, eight received intrastromal vancomycin therapy, and eight received balanced salt solution and served as the control group. Nine hours after the treatment, all rabbits were sacrificed and corneal tissues were collected for microbiological analysis. We also examined and scored all the rabbits clinically before and after the treatment. Results The control group scored higher with regard to conjunctival injection, iritis, fibrin, hypopyon, epithelial erosion, and corneal infiltrate than the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups (p = 0.031, 0.010, < 0.001, 0.029, 0.009, and < 0.001, respectively). Chemosis and corneal oedema were similar in all groups (p = 0.731 and 0.075, respectively). The severity of all clinical parameters was similar in both the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups after the treatment. The bacterial load was the highest (7.83 +/- 0.71 log(10) CFU/g) in the control group. The eyes treated with vancomycin and teicoplanin had similar bacterial loads (6.40 +/- 0.69 vs. 6.31 +/- 0.75 log(10) CFU/g, p = 0.809). Conclusion The efficiency of teicoplanin seems to be comparable to that of vancomycin when administered intrastromally in the early treatment of MRSA keratitis. The former may be preferred in the treatment of selected cases with vancomycin hypersensitivity or resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1402
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of Linezolid, Teicoplanin, and Vancomycin in Prevention of an Experimental Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft Infection Model caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Mese, Bulent
    Bozoglan, Orhan
    Elveren, Serdal
    Eroglu, Erdinc
    Gul, Mustafa
    Celik, Ahmet
    Ciralik, Harun
    Yildirimdemir, Halil Ibrahim
    Yasim, Alptekin
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 909 - 914
  • [32] In vitro antibacterial effect of vancomycin hydrogel on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Yang, Qinde
    Wang, Jing
    Yang, Yufang
    Li, Suting
    Dong, Yujun
    Sun, Yan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (06): : 3964 - 3971
  • [33] METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS KERATITIS TREATED WITH VANCOMYCIN
    GOODMAN, DF
    GOTTSCH, JD
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 106 (11) : 1570 - 1571
  • [34] Intrastromal Administration of Vancomycin to Maximize Its Early Effect on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Keratitis: A Rabbit Study
    Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel
    Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic
    Behcet, Mustafa
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2022, 30 (06) : 1430 - 1435
  • [35] Treatment of infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Teicoplanin versus vancomycin in a retrospective study
    Huang, Jih-Hsin
    Hsu, Ron-Bin
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 40 (6-7) : 462 - 467
  • [36] Comparison of Linezolid and Vancomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia: Institutional Implications
    Tong, ManShan C.
    Wisniewski, Christopher S.
    Wolf, Bethany
    Bosso, John A.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 36 (07): : 731 - 739
  • [37] TEICOPLANIN COMPARED WITH VANCOMYCIN FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL ENDOCARDITIS DUE TO METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS
    GALETTO, DW
    BOSCIA, JA
    KOBASA, WD
    KAYE, D
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1986, 154 (01): : 69 - 75
  • [38] Comparison of Six Generic Vancomycin Products for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Experimental Endocarditis in Rabbits
    Tattevin, P.
    Saleh-Mghir, A.
    Davido, B.
    Ghout, I.
    Massias, L.
    Garcia de la Maria, C.
    Miro, J. M.
    Perronne, C.
    Laurent, F.
    Cremieux, A. C.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 57 (03) : 1157 - 1162
  • [39] Comparison of intravitreal vancomycin and daptomycin application in experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endophthalmitis in rabbits
    Coskun, Erol
    Okumus, Seydi
    Gurler, Bulent
    Demir, Tuncer
    Bahar, A. Yasir
    Zer, Yasemin
    Comez, Aysegul
    Tatar, Mehmet Gurkan
    Aksoy, Umit
    Erbagci, Ibrahim
    CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 32 (03) : 222 - 227
  • [40] Lysostaphin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in the rabbit
    Dajcs, JJ
    Hume, EBH
    Moreau, JM
    Caballero, AR
    Cannon, BM
    O'Callaghan, RJ
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (06) : 1432 - 1437