Comparison of the effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis

被引:6
|
作者
Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel [1 ]
Behcet, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Training & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Kilicarslan Mah 144,Sk 7-6 Merkez, Bolu, Turkey
[2] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Microbiol, Bolu, Turkey
关键词
Keratitis; Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-021-01696-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the early efficacy and safety of intrastromal injection of teicoplanin as the alternative treatment for the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis by comparing it with vancomycin. Materials and methods Twenty-four eyes of 24 New Zealand white rabbits were included in the study. MRSA keratitis was induced in the right eye of each rabbit by injecting 0.1 mL MRSA suspension containing 1000 colony-forming units (CFU) intrastromally to the central cornea. The rabbits were divided into three treatment groups 24 h after the inoculation of MRSA. Eight rabbits received intrastromal teicoplanin therapy, eight received intrastromal vancomycin therapy, and eight received balanced salt solution and served as the control group. Nine hours after the treatment, all rabbits were sacrificed and corneal tissues were collected for microbiological analysis. We also examined and scored all the rabbits clinically before and after the treatment. Results The control group scored higher with regard to conjunctival injection, iritis, fibrin, hypopyon, epithelial erosion, and corneal infiltrate than the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups (p = 0.031, 0.010, < 0.001, 0.029, 0.009, and < 0.001, respectively). Chemosis and corneal oedema were similar in all groups (p = 0.731 and 0.075, respectively). The severity of all clinical parameters was similar in both the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups after the treatment. The bacterial load was the highest (7.83 +/- 0.71 log(10) CFU/g) in the control group. The eyes treated with vancomycin and teicoplanin had similar bacterial loads (6.40 +/- 0.69 vs. 6.31 +/- 0.75 log(10) CFU/g, p = 0.809). Conclusion The efficiency of teicoplanin seems to be comparable to that of vancomycin when administered intrastromally in the early treatment of MRSA keratitis. The former may be preferred in the treatment of selected cases with vancomycin hypersensitivity or resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1402
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis
    Ahmet Yucel Ucgul
    Mustafa Behcet
    International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 1395 - 1402
  • [2] Vancomycin versus teicoplanin in the therapy of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) meningitis
    Sipahi, OR
    Arda, B
    Yurtseven, T
    Sipahi, H
    Ozgiray, E
    Suntur, BM
    Ulusoy, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2005, 26 (05) : 412 - 415
  • [3] Comparison of the efficacy of tigecycline and teicoplanin in an experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis model
    Kandemir, O.
    Oztuna, V.
    Colak, M.
    Akdag, A.
    Camdeviren, H.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 20 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [4] Linezolid Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis in Rabbits
    Tas, Tekin
    Kucukbayrak, Abdulkadir
    Hakyemez, Ismail N.
    Mengeloglu, Firat Z.
    Simavli, Huseyin
    Ozyalvacli, Gulzade
    Erdurmus, Mesut
    CORNEA, 2013, 32 (07) : 1052 - 1057
  • [5] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in a dog
    Tajima, Kazuki
    Sinjyo, Akiko
    Ito, Toshio
    Noda, Yoshizumi
    Goto, Hiroshi
    Ito, Norihiko
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 16 (03) : 240 - 243
  • [6] In vitro combined effects of cefozopran/teicoplanin and cefozopran/vancomycin on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Toyokawa, M
    Asari, S
    Nishi, I
    Horikawa, M
    Tsukamoto, H
    Sunada, A
    Ueda, A
    Iwatani, Y
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 15 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [7] In Vitro Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates to Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolide and Daptomycin
    Celikbilek, Nevreste
    Ozdem, Birsen
    Gurelik, Feryal C.
    Guvenman, Selda
    Guner, H. Rahmet
    Acikgoz, Ziya Cibali
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (03): : 512 - 518
  • [8] Comparative study of teicoplanin vs vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia
    Liu, CY
    Lee, WS
    Fung, CP
    Cheng, NC
    Liu, CL
    Yang, SP
    Chen, SL
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1996, 12 (02) : 80 - 87
  • [9] Susceptibility of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, pristinamycin and other antibiotics
    Samra, Z
    Ofer, O
    Shmuely, H
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 7 (03): : 148 - 150
  • [10] COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VANCOMYCIN AND TEICOPLANIN IN THE TREATMENT OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS PNEUMONIA
    Chang, C. Y.
    Cheng, S. L.
    Chang, S. C.
    Liao, C. H.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2012, 17 : 112 - 112