Reasoning and interaction for social artificial intelligence

被引:3
|
作者
Black, Elizabeth [1 ]
Brandao, Martim [1 ]
Cocarascu, Oana [1 ]
De Keijzer, Bart [1 ]
Du, Yali [1 ]
Long, Derek [1 ]
Luck, Michael [1 ]
McBurney, Peter [1 ]
Merono-Penuela, Albert [1 ]
Miles, Simon [1 ]
Modgil, Sanjay [1 ]
Moreau, Luc [1 ]
Polukarov, Maria [1 ]
Rodrigues, Odinaldo [1 ]
Ventre, Carmine [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Informat, Bush House,30 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, England
关键词
Argumentation; norms; agent-based simulation; strategic interaction; multi-agent reinforcement learning; dialogue protocols; ESTABLISHING NORMS; RESOURCE OVERDRAFT; BELIEF CONTRACTION; ANTI-FORMULAS; ARGUMENTATION; ACCEPTABILITY; METANORMS; DELETION; TRUST; LOGIC;
D O I
10.3233/AIC-220133
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Current work on multi-agent systems at King's College London is extensive, though largely based in two research groups within the Department of Informatics: the Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI) thematic group and the Reasoning & Planning (RAP) thematic group. DAI combines AI expertise with political and economic theories and data, to explore social and technological contexts of interacting intelligent entities. It develops computational models for analysing social, political and economic phenomena to improve the effectiveness and fairness of policies and regulations, and combines intelligent agent systems, software engineering, norms, trust and reputation, agent-based simulation, communication and provenance of data, knowledge engineering, crowd computing and semantic technologies, and algorithmic game theory and computational social choice, to address problems arising in autonomous systems, financial markets, privacy and security, urban living and health. RAP conducts research in symbolic models for reasoning involving argumentation, knowledge representation, planning, and other related areas, including development of logical models of argumentation-based reasoning and decision-making, and their usage for explainable AI and integration of machine and human reasoning, as well as combining planning and argumentation methodologies for strategic argumentation.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 325
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Temporal representation and reasoning in artificial intelligence: A review
    Pani, AK
    Bhattacharjee, GP
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2001, 34 (1-2) : 55 - 80
  • [22] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CONSERVATION. Artificial Intelligence for Social Good
    Spagnolo, Fabrizio
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2020, : 275 - 275
  • [23] Artificial intelligence and social work
    Griniuk, Marija
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 55 (07) : 1398 - 1400
  • [24] Social implications of artificial intelligence
    Vickery, B
    [J]. SEARCH, 1997, 28 (10): : 316 - 316
  • [25] The social turn of artificial intelligence
    Cristianini, Nello
    Scantamburlo, Teresa
    Ladyman, James
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [26] The social turn of artificial intelligence
    Nello Cristianini
    Teresa Scantamburlo
    James Ladyman
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 : 89 - 96
  • [27] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR A SOCIAL WORLD
    Cassell, Justine
    [J]. Issues in Science and Technology, 2019, 35 (04) : 29 - 36
  • [28] REASONING IN ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE - FRENCH - HALTON,JP
    STRIZENEC, M
    [J]. CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE, 1993, 37 (02): : 177 - 178
  • [29] Toward Artificial Emotional Intelligence for Cooperative Social Human-Machine Interaction
    Erol, Berat A.
    Majumdar, Abhijit
    Benavidez, Patrick
    Rad, Paul
    Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
    Jamshidi, Mo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 7 (01): : 234 - 246
  • [30] Basic Science in Medical Reasoning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach
    Ramoni, Marco
    Riva, Alberto
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 1997, 2 (02) : 131 - 140