The purpose of this study was to analyze how school psychologists engaged in problem analysis during problem-solving consultation. Five aspects of the problem analysis process were examined: 1) the types of questions participants asked during problem identification, 2) the types of data participants requested, 3) the frequency of requests for each type of data, 4) the use of multiple methods and sources of data across multiple domains, and 5) the criteria used to interpret the data. Four school psychologists were recruited to each complete three fictional consultation cases within a computer-simulated environment. A qualitative case study method was used. The results of this study revealed how school psychologists used theory, a multidimensional assessment framework, and self-referent data to analyze a problem. Implications for future research are discussed. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机构:
Univ Missouri Kansas City, Dept Econ, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
Univ Missouri Kansas City, Social Sci Consortium, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
James Madison Univ, Ctr Computat Math & Modeling, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USAUniv Missouri Kansas City, Dept Econ, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
Giannakouros, Panayotis
Chen, Lihua
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
James Madison Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USAUniv Missouri Kansas City, Dept Econ, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA