Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Liu, Xin [1 ]
Yang, Wei-hong [2 ]
Jiao, Zhou-guang [3 ]
Zhang, Ji-fu [1 ]
Zhang, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Liaoning Canc Hosp & Inst, 44 Xiaoheyan Rd, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Inst Phys Sci & Informat Technol, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Inst Microbiol & Epidemiol, State Key Lab Pathogen & Biosecur, Beijing 100071, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Single incision; Conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy; Right colon cancer; Meta-analysis; RIGHT COLECTOMY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; PORT;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-019-1721-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (SILS) has long used in surgery for a long time. However, there is barely a systemic review related to the comparison between the SILS and the conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (CLS) for the right colon cancer in the long term follow-up. Herein, we used the most recent articles to compare these two techniques by meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Wanfang databases to compare SILS with CLS for right colon cancer up to May 2019. The operative, postoperative, pathological and mid-term follow-up outcomes of nine studies were extracted and compared. Results A total of 1356 patients participated in 9 studies, while 653 patients were assigned to the SILS group and 703 patients were assigned to the CLS group. The patients' baselines in the SILS group were consistent with those in the CLS group. Compared to the CLS group, the SILS group had a shorter operation duration (SMD - 23.49, 95%CI - 36.71 to - 10.27, P < 0.001, chi-square = 24.11), shorter hospital stay (SMD - 0.76, 95% `CI - 1.07 to - 0.45, P < 0.001, chi-square = 9.85), less blood loss (SMD - 8.46, 95% CI - 14.59 to - 2.34; P < 0.05; chi-square = 2.26), smaller incision length (SMD - 1.60, 95% CI - 2.66 to - 0.55, P < 0.001; chi-square = 280.44), more lymph node harvested (SMD - 0.98, 95% CI - 1.79 to - 0.16, P < 0.05; chi-square = 4.61), and a longer proximal surgical edge (SMD - 0.51, 95% CI - 0.93 to - 0.09, P < 0.05; chi-square = 2.42). No significant difference was found in other indexes. After we removed a single large study, we performed another meta-analysis again. The operation duration in the SILS group was still better than that in the CLS group. Conclusion SILS could be a faster and more reliable approach than CLS for the right colon cancer and could accelerate patient recovery, especially for patients with a low BMI.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases
    Chew, Min-Hoe
    Chang, Mei-Huan
    Tan, Wah-Siew
    Wong, Mark Te-Ching
    Tang, Choong-Leong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (02): : 471 - 477
  • [32] Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis
    Masashi Yamamoto
    Mitsuhiro Asakuma
    Keitaro Tanaka
    Shinsuke Masubuchi
    Masatsugu Ishii
    Wataru Osumi
    Hiroki Hamamoto
    Junji Okuda
    Kazuhisa Uchiyama
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 3616 - 3622
  • [33] Clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal resection for advanced colon cancer: propensity score matching analysis
    Yamamoto, Masashi
    Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
    Tanaka, Keitaro
    Masubuchi, Shinsuke
    Ishii, Masatsugu
    Osumi, Wataru
    Hamamoto, Hiroki
    Okuda, Junji
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (11): : 3616 - 3622
  • [34] Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Right Hemicolectomy versus Conventional Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Is LESS More?
    Walker, Travelyan
    Patel, Vijaykumar G.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2012, 78 (07) : E349 - E351
  • [35] Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of Available Data
    Song, Turun
    Liao, Banghua
    Liu, Jiao
    Yin, Yuan
    Luo, Qian
    Cheng, Nansheng
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (04): : E190 - E196
  • [36] Single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy due to cancer of the colon: surgical technique and preliminary results
    Hoyuela, Carlos
    Ardid, Jordi
    Martrat, Antoni
    Obiols, Joan
    Guillaumes, Salvador
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2011, 89 (08): : 551 - 553
  • [37] Learning curves for single incision and conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a multidimensional analysis
    Park, Yoonah
    Yong, Yuen Geng
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Jung, Kyung Uk
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 88 (05) : 269 - 275
  • [38] Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy: our initial experience with 10 cases
    Wong, M. T. C.
    Ng, K. H.
    Ho, K. S.
    Eu, K. W.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2010, 14 (03) : 225 - 228
  • [39] Single-incision Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Inferior-to-Superior Approach With Intracorporeal Anastomosis
    Haas, Eric M.
    Pedraza, Rodrigo
    Nieto, Javier
    Malave, Victor
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (06): : E226 - E227
  • [40] The Outcome of Single-incision Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Colon Carcinoma in the Elderly
    Hirano, Yasumitsu
    Hattori, Masakazu
    Sato, Yoshiki
    Maeda, Kazuya
    Douden, Kenji
    Hashizume, Yasuo
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (04): : 338 - 340