Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

被引:370
|
作者
Fisher, B
Dignam, J
Wolmark, N
DeCillis, A
Emir, B
Wickerham, DL
Bryant, J
Dimitrov, NV
Abramson, N
Atkins, JN
Shibata, H
Deschenes, L
Margolese, RG
机构
[1] UNIV PITTSBURGH, NATL SURG ADJUVANT BREAST & BOWEL PROJECT, DEPT BIOSTAT, PITTSBURGH, PA 15260 USA
[2] ALLEGHENY GEN HOSP, NSABP, PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 USA
[3] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV, NSABP, E LANSING, MI 48824 USA
[4] BAPTIST REG CANC INST, NSABP, JACKSONVILLE, FL USA
[5] SE CANC CONTROL CONSORTIUM, COMMUNITY CLIN ONCOL PROGRAM, NSABP, WINSTON SALEM, NC USA
[6] ROYAL VICTORIA HOSP, NSABP, MONTREAL, PQ H3A 1A1, CANADA
[7] ST SACREMENT HOSP, NSABP, QUEBEC CITY, PQ, CANADA
[8] MCGILL UNIV, JEWISH GEN HOSP, NSABP, MONTREAL, PQ H3T 1E2, CANADA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/89.22.1673
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The B-20 study of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) was conducted to determine whether chemotherapy plus tamoxifen would be of greater benefit than tamoxifen alone in the treatment of patients with axillary lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods: Eligible patients (n = 2306) were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups following surgery. A total of 771 patients with followup data received tamoxifen alone; 767 received methotrexate, fluorouracil, and tamoxifen (MFT); and 768 received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and tamoxifen (CMFT). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and survival. Reported P values are two-sided. Results: Through 5 years of follow-up, chemotherapy plus tamoxifen resulted in significantly better disease-free survival than tamoxifen alone (90% for MFT versus 85% for tamoxifen [P = .01]; 89% for CMFT versus 85% for tamoxifen [P = .001]). A similar benefit was observed in both distant disease-free survival (92% for MFT versus 87% for tamoxifen [P = .008]; 91% for CMFT versus 87% for tamoxifen [P = .006]) and survival (97% for MFT versus 94% for tamoxifen [P = .05]; 96% for CMFT versus 94% for tamoxifen [P = .03]). Compared with tamoxifen alone, MFT and CMFT reduced the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after lumpectomy and the risk of recurrence at other local, regional, and distant sites. Risk of treatment failure was reduced after both types of chemotherapy, regardless of tumor size, tumor estrogen or progesterone receptor level, or patient age; however, the reduction was greatest in patients aged 49 years or less. No subgroup of patients evaluated in this study failed to benefit from chemotherapy. Conclusions: Findings from this and other NSABP studies indicate that patients with breast cancer who meet NSABP protocol criteria, regardless of age, lymph node status, tumor size, or estrogen receptor status, are candidates for chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1682
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What Is the Optimal Model to Estimate the Benefits of Chemotherapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Negative Breast Cancer?
    Ando, Kenju
    Shimomura, Akihiko
    Yoshimura, Kenichi
    Kawamura, Yukino
    Shimizu, Chikako
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (17) : 1946 - +
  • [42] MDM2 amplification is an independent prognostic feature of node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer
    Choschzick, Matthias
    Heilenkoetter, Uwe
    Lebeau, Annette
    Jaenicke, Fritz
    Terracciano, Luigi
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Sauter, Guido
    Simon, Ronald
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2010, 8 (02) : 53 - 60
  • [44] DECRESCENDO: de-escalating chemotherapy in HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-negative, node-negative early breast cancer
    Debien, Veronique
    Adam, Virginie
    Coart, Elisabeth
    Agostinetto, Elisa
    Goulioti, Theodora
    Molinelli, Chiara
    Arahmani, Amal
    Zoppoli, Gabriele
    Piccart, Martine
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2023, 19 (24) : 1655 - 1667
  • [45] Evaluation of Prognosis in Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative and Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer With Low Oncotype DX Recurrence Score
    Meisel, Jane
    Zhang, Chao
    Neely, Cameron
    Menduza, Pia
    You, Shuo
    Han, Tatiana
    Liu, Yuan
    Sahin, Aysegul A.
    O'Regan, Ruth
    Li, Xiaoxian
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (05) : 347 - 352
  • [46] Lymph Node Ratio Analysis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Prognostic in Hormone Receptor-Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Jacqueline Tsai
    Danielle Bertoni
    Tina Hernandez-Boussard
    Melinda L. Telli
    Irene L. Wapnir
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 3310 - 3316
  • [47] Mechanisms associated with resistance to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (Review)
    Viedma-Rodriguez, Rubi
    Baiza-Gutman, Luis
    Salamanca-Gomez, Fabio
    Diaz-Zaragoza, Mariana
    Martinez-Hernandez, Guadalupe
    Ruiz Esparza-Garrido, Ruth
    Angel Velazquez-Flores, Miguel
    Arenas-Aranda, Diego
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 32 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [48] Lymph Node Ratio Analysis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Prognostic in Hormone Receptor-Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Tsai, Jacqueline
    Bertoni, Danielle
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Telli, Melinda L.
    Wapnir, Irene L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) : 3310 - 3316
  • [49] Steroid Receptor RNA Activator Protein (SRAP): A Potential New Prognostic Marker for Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Node-Negative/Younger Breast Cancer Patients
    Yan, Y.
    Skliris, G. P.
    Penner, C. C.
    Chooniedass-Kothari, S.
    Cooper, C.
    Nugent, Z.
    Fristenski, A.
    Hamedani, M. K.
    Blanchard, A.
    Myal, Y.
    Murphy, L. C.
    Leygue, E.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (24) : 597S - 597S
  • [50] Survival Benefit of Tamoxifen in Estrogen Receptor-Negative and Progesterone Receptor-Positive Low Grade Breast Cancer Patients
    Yang, Li-Heng
    Tseng, Hsin-Shun
    Lin, Che
    Chen, Li-Sheng
    Chen, Shou-Tung
    Kuo, Shou-Jen
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2012, 15 (03) : 288 - 295