Optimal electrocardiographically triggered phase for reducing motion artifact at electron-beam CT in the coronary artery

被引:19
|
作者
He, S
Dai, RP
Chen, Y
Bai, H
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, Cardiovasc Inst, Dept Radiol, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Fuwai Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
关键词
computed tomography (CT); artifact; electron beam; coronary vessels; CT;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80743-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors performed this study to (a) investigate coronary movement with electron-beam computed tomography (CT) and (b) find the optimal electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering phase for eliminating motion artifact. Materials and Methods. One hundred fifty-one patients without arrhythmia were examined with electron-beam CT. First, movie scans were obtained to create displacement and velocity graphs of coronary artery movement. Then, a volume scan with an exposure time of 100 msec was obtained with various ECG trigger settings. Results. Movement patterns of coronary arteries varied with heart rate. Optimal triggering phase was before atrial systole (near 71% of the R-R interval) when heart rate was slower than 68 beats per minute and at ventricular end systole when heart rate was fast. Rate of severe motion artifacts decreased from 43% to 0% when triggering was altered from 80% of the R-R interval to the individual optimal value. Experimental values of the optimal phase at different heart rates were derived, and severe motion artifact was only 3.0% with these values. Conclusion, ECG triggering set according to the heart rate enables a great reduction in motion artifacts at electron-beam CT with a 100-msec exposure time. The results may have implications for magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary arte rv.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 56
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Virtual endoscopy of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced ECG triggered electron-beam CT data sets
    Nakanishi, T
    Yumura, A
    Fukami, K
    Ikeda, M
    Fukuoka, H
    Ito, K
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 306 - 306
  • [42] Coronary artery disease progression assessed by electron-beam computed tomography
    Budoff, MJ
    Raggi, P
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (2A): : 46E - 50E
  • [44] Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Low-dose Prospective Electrocardiographically-triggered 64-Slice CT
    Horiguchi, Jun
    Matsuura, Noriaki
    Yamamoto, Hideya
    Kiguchi, Masao
    Fujioka, Chikako
    Kitagawa, Toshiro
    Kohno, Nobuoki
    Ito, Katsuhide
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (02) : 187 - 193
  • [45] Electron-beam computed tomography screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease
    Bielak, LF
    Peyser, PA
    Sheedy, PF
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 38 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [46] Imaging the coronary venous drainage system using electron-beam CT
    Schaffler, GJ
    Groell, R
    Peichel, KH
    Rienmüller, R
    [J]. SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2000, 22 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [47] Imaging the coronary venous drainage system using electron-beam CT
    G. J. Schaffler
    R. Groell
    K. H. Peichel
    R. Rienmüller
    [J]. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2000, 22 : 35 - 39
  • [48] The relationship between clinical coronary events and coronary artery calcium as detected by the Electron-Beam Ultrafast CT Scan in diabetes.
    Le, T
    Wong, N
    Detrano, R
    Charles, MA
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 1999, 42 : A59 - A59
  • [49] Correlation between calcification of the carotid arteries documented by ultrasound, coronary calcifications in electron-beam CT, and angiographic coronary artery disease
    Moshage, W
    Achenbach, S
    Schwarz, T
    Brandt-Pohlmann, M
    Daniel, WG
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 : 569 - 569
  • [50] Coronary artery: Quantitative evaluation of normal diameter determined with electron-beam CT compared with cine coronary angiography - Initial experience
    Funabashi, N
    Kobayashi, Y
    Perlroth, M
    Rubin, GD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) : 263 - 271